Compound or recurve?
#11
Thread Starter
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Forest, Ontario
Posts: 250
RE: Compound or recurve?
Thanks for the help guys, maybe I just might go recurve. I am also kinda researching this for school so do recurve positives outweigh compound positives.
Burnie-No, I don't shoot a bow yet even though I hunt with an Excalibur crossbow.
ONbuckhunter-I don't live IN Drayton, I live just outside of it on Sideroad 12.
Burnie-No, I don't shoot a bow yet even though I hunt with an Excalibur crossbow.
ONbuckhunter-I don't live IN Drayton, I live just outside of it on Sideroad 12.
#12
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 26,274
RE: Compound or recurve?
I would say a compound out weighs a recurve in every aspect. That would be in consideration towards ease and accuracy. A compound is very easy to learn compared to a recurve. Or from what I witness. I grew up with recurves, and learned on a recurve/long bow and going to compounds took me about a day or two to get to where I had good groups out to 20 yards. I cant say Ive seen that with people going from compounds to recurves. Compounds are very forgiving. You cant over draw or under draw a compound. Well you can, but it will let you know. Its also much easier to hold a compound, especially since some have as much as 85% let off.
#14
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 26,274
RE: Compound or recurve?
ORIGINAL: BobCo19-65
How about getting a shot off quickly, or shooting at moving targets such as pheasants, ducks, fish, etc.?
I would say a compound out weighs a recurve in every aspect.
#15
RE: Compound or recurve?
It does take years of practice and experiance to accomplish those tasks.Im simple saying in the case of someone wanting to get a bow and start shooting at a target.
I understand what you mean. And I should have read your initial post a bit better. It does take a while to develope form and then accuracy with traditioanl equipment, but when it happens, it can be even more deadly then a compound in a lot of situations, especially within 30 yards.
#16
Join Date: May 2006
Location:
Posts: 449
RE: Compound or recurve?
(generally speaking)
compound is vastly more accurate. pick it up, shoot 10 minutes and you'll be good enough to hunt with.
they're that good
recurve/longbows take a lot of practice. Not as much money into them vs a high dollar compound either. not as accurate, by far
your choice in weapoins, just make sure the arrow goes where you want it to. I choose trad archery for the challenge. Compounds are no challenge to be accurate with for me.
compound is vastly more accurate. pick it up, shoot 10 minutes and you'll be good enough to hunt with.
they're that good
recurve/longbows take a lot of practice. Not as much money into them vs a high dollar compound either. not as accurate, by far
your choice in weapoins, just make sure the arrow goes where you want it to. I choose trad archery for the challenge. Compounds are no challenge to be accurate with for me.
#18
Dominant Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: land of the Lilliputians, In the state of insanity
Posts: 26,274
RE: Compound or recurve?
ORIGINAL: BobCo19-65
I understand what you mean. And I should have read your initial post a bit better. It does take a while to develope form and then accuracy with traditioanl equipment, but when it happens, it can be even more deadly then a compound in a lot of situations, especially within 30 yards.
It does take years of practice and experiance to accomplish those tasks.Im simple saying in the case of someone wanting to get a bow and start shooting at a target.
I understand what you mean. And I should have read your initial post a bit better. It does take a while to develope form and then accuracy with traditioanl equipment, but when it happens, it can be even more deadly then a compound in a lot of situations, especially within 30 yards.
#19
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location:
Posts: 172
RE: Compound or recurve?
I gave up the compound last fall and picked up a chek-mate falcon and I have never being happier. The falcon is a fantastic recurve for the money and once you get form and learn the bow its alot more fun to hunt and shoot(just my opinion) more challenging but less to worry about on the technical side no sights to fiddle with no arrow rest to worry about.
If you go with the recurve you will never look back. As mentioned above with a compound once its set up and tuned you can be very effective with it in a very short time and hang it up for mths and pick it up before hunting season starts and be just as good, but with a recuve/longbow you have to practice all the time to keep your skills sharp enough to take game effectively. Good luck and have fun with whatever you choose.
If you go with the recurve you will never look back. As mentioned above with a compound once its set up and tuned you can be very effective with it in a very short time and hang it up for mths and pick it up before hunting season starts and be just as good, but with a recuve/longbow you have to practice all the time to keep your skills sharp enough to take game effectively. Good luck and have fun with whatever you choose.
#20
RE: Compound or recurve?
Not as much money into them vs a high dollar compound either.