NAP Quick Tune 4000
#5
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location:
Posts: 63

Just got one myself. I would have to agree the adjustability is awesome. And I am sure you noticed the great alternative to the common nylon cord tied/served to the string. My dialed right in and shoots great. Everyone I talked likes them that is except for some trophy taker owners which love their rests.
#6
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 53

I have both a Trophy Taker and a QT4000.
I agree with everything that's already been said about it. My only dislike was the noise made when drawing an arrow across it. My TT is dead silent.
The man who works at the pro shop that I frequent (a highly experienced bow hunter and competitor) said that the only thing that he didn't like about rests that tie into the cable slide is that moisture can sometimes make them "stutter" and cause the rest to fail. He said that he has seen it happen often enough to keep him away from those types of rests.
He sells both and has no interest in swaying the customer one way or the other from a sales standpoint.
I switched back to the TT for it's utter simplicity, ruggedness and silence.
My bow shot very well with the QT4000 in place.
I agree with everything that's already been said about it. My only dislike was the noise made when drawing an arrow across it. My TT is dead silent.
The man who works at the pro shop that I frequent (a highly experienced bow hunter and competitor) said that the only thing that he didn't like about rests that tie into the cable slide is that moisture can sometimes make them "stutter" and cause the rest to fail. He said that he has seen it happen often enough to keep him away from those types of rests.
He sells both and has no interest in swaying the customer one way or the other from a sales standpoint.
I switched back to the TT for it's utter simplicity, ruggedness and silence.
My bow shot very well with the QT4000 in place.
#7

Thus far, out of any rest I've tried the NAP 4000 was my favorite. Unfortunately, it won't work on the new Bowtechs because of lack of windage adjustment. I've since moved to a Trophy Taker, which for lack of better terms, I despise. The NAP 4000 give you micro adjustments and is quiter IMO than the Trophy Taker. The noise you hear when drawing the bow can be cured with moleskin, just like the trophy taker. Also, the cable guard should not shutter when you draw either. NAP has made a correction to early version of the rest and fixed the shuttering slide problem. Mine worked flawless.
#8
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Berks County, PA
Posts: 53

My QT has given me no reason for complaints. It's a pretty nice rest. I like the simple design of the TT. Set and forget. Although I think it would be hard to knock the QT out of alignment.
I'm not sellilng the QT4000. I'll probably put it on my wife's bow.
I'm not sellilng the QT4000. I'll probably put it on my wife's bow.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
archery-aholic
Bowhunting Gear Review
9
04-01-2005 07:38 AM
HANKFAN
Bowhunting Gear Review
9
11-17-2002 09:11 PM