HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Bowhunting Gear Review (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-gear-review-31/)
-   -   NAP Quick Tune 4000 (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/bowhunting-gear-review/92659-nap-quick-tune-4000-a.html)

Booney160 03-03-2005 02:13 PM

NAP Quick Tune 4000
 
Anyone use the NAP Quick Tune 4000 fall away rest? Any opinions on this product, pros and cons? Thanks for the information...

newman1 03-03-2005 02:25 PM

RE: NAP Quick Tune 4000
 
I have one on my Black Knight and works great but it seems on my bow i can't get enough left windage to get a perfect tune,but i just compensate for it with my sights.:D

i shoot stuff 03-03-2005 08:18 PM

RE: NAP Quick Tune 4000
 
i got just a regular nap rest it was perfect about 8 years old. i was shootin at a shoot and somethin popped off but a guy there went in the back and fixed it

djkiller 03-09-2005 08:37 PM

RE: NAP Quick Tune 4000
 
I got the quick tune 4000 drop away also. I love it. i especially like the micro tuning capabilities. Not sure on windage problems w/. dont have that w/ mine.


Maghunter 03-28-2005 12:29 AM

RE: NAP Quick Tune 4000
 
Just got one myself. I would have to agree the adjustability is awesome. And I am sure you noticed the great alternative to the common nylon cord tied/served to the string. My dialed right in and shoots great. Everyone I talked likes them that is except for some trophy taker owners which love their rests.

Landjaeger 03-28-2005 03:25 PM

RE: NAP Quick Tune 4000
 
I have both a Trophy Taker and a QT4000.

I agree with everything that's already been said about it. My only dislike was the noise made when drawing an arrow across it. My TT is dead silent.

The man who works at the pro shop that I frequent (a highly experienced bow hunter and competitor) said that the only thing that he didn't like about rests that tie into the cable slide is that moisture can sometimes make them "stutter" and cause the rest to fail. He said that he has seen it happen often enough to keep him away from those types of rests.
He sells both and has no interest in swaying the customer one way or the other from a sales standpoint.

I switched back to the TT for it's utter simplicity, ruggedness and silence.
My bow shot very well with the QT4000 in place.

muzzyman88 03-28-2005 06:35 PM

RE: NAP Quick Tune 4000
 
Thus far, out of any rest I've tried the NAP 4000 was my favorite. Unfortunately, it won't work on the new Bowtechs because of lack of windage adjustment. I've since moved to a Trophy Taker, which for lack of better terms, I despise. The NAP 4000 give you micro adjustments and is quiter IMO than the Trophy Taker. The noise you hear when drawing the bow can be cured with moleskin, just like the trophy taker. Also, the cable guard should not shutter when you draw either. NAP has made a correction to early version of the rest and fixed the shuttering slide problem. Mine worked flawless.

Landjaeger 03-28-2005 06:50 PM

RE: NAP Quick Tune 4000
 
My QT has given me no reason for complaints. It's a pretty nice rest. I like the simple design of the TT. Set and forget. Although I think it would be hard to knock the QT out of alignment.
I'm not sellilng the QT4000. I'll probably put it on my wife's bow.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:40 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.