Community
Bowhunting Gear Review Broadheads, arrows, rests, bows, and more... read the latest reviews of hot new gear items related to archery and bowhunting.

Turbo Nocks, anyone?

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-19-2004, 03:05 PM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
MikeE51848's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Jim Thorpe, PA
Posts: 536
Default Turbo Nocks, anyone?

Purchased them at the outdoor show last winter and finally tried one today. My arrow shot well below the target (twice), which tells me they are actually slower than my 5 inch feathers. Anybody else use them?
MikeE51848 is offline  
Old 07-19-2004, 06:37 PM
  #2  
c j
Typical Buck
 
c j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 581
Default RE: Turbo Nocks, anyone?

I'm curious about their performance, too. I was thinking about trying either turbo nocks or FOBs, but I didn't want to buy them and tear off good fletching to try them if they don't have any noticeable benefits.

Has anyone tried FOBs or Turbo Nocks? Is there any difference between them and conventional feathers/vanes as far as noise? Accuracy? Speed?
c j is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 07:46 AM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
BobCo19-65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 7,571
Default RE: Turbo Nocks, anyone?

cj, from my experience with them (turbo nocks), they are extremely noisy, are heavy, will through off FOC, and have questionable accuracy with fixed broadheads. I used them for a few weeks and went back to feathers and vanes.
BobCo19-65 is offline  
Old 07-21-2004, 12:16 PM
  #4  
c j
Typical Buck
 
c j's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 581
Default RE: Turbo Nocks, anyone?

Thank you, BobCo19-65. I appreciate the help.
c j is offline  
Old 07-23-2004, 12:13 AM
  #5  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Flagstaff AZ USA
Posts: 28
Default RE: Turbo Nocks, anyone?

I've tried FOBs now for several weeks and like the results. They definately stabilize the arrow quicker than any vanes that I have had. While shooting 50 yd shots I kept hitting a tall weed about 7 yards from the target (until I yanked the thing). I watched several arrows kick their back end out when hitting the weed but stabilize and hit where I intended within the final 7 yards. All in all, my point of contact actually did move up just slightly, which I am attributing to a slightly lower weight compared to vanes. All in all, they brought my broadhead contact very close to my point contact location with no site or bow tuning. Two potential downsides. First, you have to use the FOBs with a drop away rest that gets out of the way quickly. They aren't very forgiving if it hits your rest. Second, from my point of view as a shooter they sound loud. However, I had a friend stand just off my target while shooting 30 yd shots and he couldn't tell an audible difference downrange between the FOBs and arizona vanes. Although I said two downsides, one other one is that you can't stack arrows with them. They are expensive and when you stack arrows chances are you will blow a few apart. Bottom line for me...I bought several more and am going to hunt bull elk in one of Arizona's trophy units this fall with them. Hope this info helped. By the way, trying to tear vanes off of carbons is hardly worth the effort. I started from scratch with these things on bare shafts.
azmedman is offline  
Old 07-25-2004, 08:12 AM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Detroit
Posts: 858
Default RE: Turbo Nocks, anyone?

I actually Love the Turbos. I find them to be more forgiving than the feathers I shot before. FOC isn't a worry with them though as you have such a spin it just makes the FOC calcs irrelavent.

The hunters will stabilize fixed blade heads but only the smaller ones. I've shot NAP Nitrons and Wac'em archery Triton heads both at 100 grains and stack them up at 50-60-70 yards.

They are a little heavy but the hunters weigh in at real close to 50 grains...but they're longer than a conventional nock as well.

SO...you can cut 1" off the arrow -6 to 10 gr
You lose the fletch -5 to 12 grains each
You lose the nock that's already there so figure -12 to 17 for a carbon and 20 to 30 for a Alum super or G

You can effectively have the same arrow weight and same POI as before if you were really wanting that.

They're GREAT for windy days though as they really cut through a crosswind better than the hardest hellical. Good for "open space" hunting for Antelope, MUleys and Whitetail on the prarrie or anywhere else the wind is factor.
Trushot_archer is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
trouthunter
Bowhunting Gear Review
2
11-03-2005 10:41 AM
JimBow
Bowhunting
7
11-18-2004 09:05 PM
bholder78
Bowhunting Gear Review
4
03-31-2004 11:21 AM
bronko22000
Technical
2
01-30-2004 01:48 PM
Trushot_archer
Technical
10
04-17-2003 07:12 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Turbo Nocks, anyone?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.