New powder
#14
There was also a BlackDot in a 10oz bottle that never got to market and BlackMagXP.
It appears they more or less bought the name than the formula but i don't have the original MDS for a comparison. If its by the pound and cheaper than BH209, i really want to give it a try in the 45s.
It appears they more or less bought the name than the formula but i don't have the original MDS for a comparison. If its by the pound and cheaper than BH209, i really want to give it a try in the 45s.
#15
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Yucca Valley,Ca
Posts: 2,496
There was also a BlackDot in a 10oz bottle that never got to market and BlackMagXP.
It appears they more or less bought the name than the formula but i don't have the original MDS for a comparison. If its by the pound and cheaper than BH209, i really want to give it a try in the 45s.
It appears they more or less bought the name than the formula but i don't have the original MDS for a comparison. If its by the pound and cheaper than BH209, i really want to give it a try in the 45s.
#17
http://www.grafs.com/retail/catalog/...roductId/23435
#18
Pyro MDS
http://www.wku.edu/msds/docs/Pyrodex.pdf
Looks like its easier to ignite by 70F.
777 MDS
http://www.hodgdon.com/PDF/T7-msds.pdf
About 100F less needed for ignition
Last edited by Gm54-120; 07-31-2011 at 02:56 PM.
#19
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Rivesville, WV
Posts: 3,192
It says under the description "water resistent". So I am assuming the ignition would be related to what is being used to protect the product from moisture.
Hygroscopic properties were my biggest complaint with T-7 powder. Those properties are why I swore off the T-7.
So IMO, the question about this new powder would be how is it treated(or what is it treated with) to give it a "water resistant" property??
Obviously "water resistant" is not "water proof". So I wonder what the trade off is??
And certainly this trade off is what is causing the inconsistency of ignition on most other powders?? So I wonder how this powder will differ in the ignition characteristics?? As noted by the ignition temperature in the above post??
So I wonder how the hygroscopic properties of this new powder stack up against the hygroscopic properties of T-7?? And against the hygroscopic properties of the BH-209 that so many of you speak so highly of?? VS plain old Black Powder?? Tom.
Hygroscopic properties were my biggest complaint with T-7 powder. Those properties are why I swore off the T-7.
So IMO, the question about this new powder would be how is it treated(or what is it treated with) to give it a "water resistant" property??
Obviously "water resistant" is not "water proof". So I wonder what the trade off is??
And certainly this trade off is what is causing the inconsistency of ignition on most other powders?? So I wonder how this powder will differ in the ignition characteristics?? As noted by the ignition temperature in the above post??
So I wonder how the hygroscopic properties of this new powder stack up against the hygroscopic properties of T-7?? And against the hygroscopic properties of the BH-209 that so many of you speak so highly of?? VS plain old Black Powder?? Tom.