Mountaineer prototype has arrived.
#41
I think GM54-120, might have a better handle on this, because when he purchased his LRH he had a choice of triggers to choose. With that I do believe that Knight was handling both Timney's and secondary less expensive Timney functioning trigger.
The only Knight I have that I know is a Timney is the MK-85, the others - I have never even looked because they function so well I guess it did not matter to me.
I would bet the triggers in the original LRH and the early MH & MHC series rifles were Timney's.
#42
I just wondered why the queen of CVA

BTW i will check the higher end trigger i got from Knight again. My MK did have a true Timney and the target trigger i bought looked the same but i don't remember seeing "Timney" on that trigger or the GMB54's trigger. Both are excellent though and a nice improvement over any imported ML trigger i have tried.
Only my NULA trigger is better IMO and it is a true Timney. The MK trigger though is really really close in quality.
#43
Thread Starter
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,926
Likes: 0
From: Saxonburg Pa
They have been to a couple of the big sporting goods stores already. They do have a marketing team and a sales team. I have had no contact with them. I'm sure i will talk to them at the NRA show this month and see how that's working out.
#44
Banned
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,186
Likes: 0
From: Boncarbo,Colorado
All i wanted to know is what parts knight built on their rifles, i wasnt trying to talk down on them for anything.
#45
Banned
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 9,186
Likes: 0
From: Boncarbo,Colorado
My last was an LK93 but i traded it to cayugad. Knight stocks are iffy for me, the LK93 i took a chance on and the stock actually fit me pretty good.


