Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > General Hunting Forums > Big Game Hunting
 Federal Fusion..NOT impressed >

Federal Fusion..NOT impressed

Big Game Hunting Moose, elk, mulies, caribou, bear, goats, and sheep are all covered here.

Federal Fusion..NOT impressed

Old 11-17-2006, 01:16 PM
  #31  
Dominant Buck
 
Champlain Islander's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On an Island in Vermont
Posts: 21,861
Default RE: Federal Fusion..NOT impressed

EKM.... Slo-Bo was there and I can prove it.
Champlain Islander is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 05:17 PM
  #32  
EKM
Typical Buck
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 599
Default RE: Federal Fusion..NOT impressed

Giggly Games aside,
Whether he (or you) were there or not, these two don't square up.

By RobInVT:
Hey Guys,

Well, I guess I am the "idiot" who used a 180gr 30-06 Federal Fusion on an elk. Just so everyone is clear, I was using a Winchester Model 70 in a 30-06.
Gosh, Rob, from your pictures, that's an awful big "hollow point" you were using. And you say it was from a .243 and the shot was from 350 yards? Wow!
EKM is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 05:58 PM
  #33  
Nontypical Buck
 
Rob in VT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Central VT/Big Horn WY
Posts: 1,502
Default RE: Federal Fusion..NOT impressed

EKM,

Slo-Bo and Champlain Islander were with me on the hunt and know what I was shooting. Slo-Bo is just joking around.
Rob in VT is offline  
Old 11-17-2006, 06:20 PM
  #34  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Geneseo NY USA
Posts: 163
Default RE: Federal Fusion..NOT impressed

EKM.. Iwas indeed just having a bit of fun. So many people only half read a post and then rush to get their own post in, that it sometimes becomes comical, and VERY obvious that they haven't taken the time to read and understand it.It was the same with this thread, I was just making light of it.Everything else on the thread is for real, I was just"funnin"Rob a bit with my last post. Sorry, I just have a hard time taking ALL of life too seriously! Perhaps you ought to consider not taking everything so seriously also...who knows, you might live longer.
Slo-bo is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 10:07 AM
  #35  
Typical Buck
 
rather_be_huntin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cedar Valley Utah
Posts: 977
Default RE: Federal Fusion..NOT impressed

ORIGINAL: Colorado Bob

Rather-----I've never used or seen the results of a Barnes. But I've seen the results of a partition, 1st hand.Meat loss was the sameas a core-lokt, that front half is just a standard bullet & the back half is a solid. To each there own, I stick with plain jane bullets out of a 30/06. CB
No the back half isn't solid but Brutal already addressed that. Like I said, I've seen it too many times and there IS a definite difference. But it's something you don't always see looking at it once. You have to see it several times to realize they perform differently. If dead is dead to you and meat damage isn't a concern, keep using the plain janes.
rather_be_huntin is offline  
Old 11-21-2006, 10:39 AM
  #36  
Typical Buck
 
rather_be_huntin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cedar Valley Utah
Posts: 977
Default RE: Federal Fusion..NOT impressed

It's one of those things....it's like a ladder, one step leads to another and you end up at a single destination.

Q1 - Does a "premium" (Partition, Barnes X) bulletretain it's weightbetter than a "plain jane" (core-lok't) bullet?
A1 - Proven, undisputable research says yes it does.

Then,

Q2 - What happens to the "lost" weight? Where does it go?
A2 - It fragments into smaller pieces. Since the loss is generally greater with plain jane, especially with heavy bone,these smaller pieces can have a greater "grenade" effect in the way those pieces distribute inside an animal. Sometimes these pieces break into what is called "shards" which are sometimes only detectable once the meat is being cosumed.Athough this is not too common it has happened to me and quite frankly sucks.

Then,

Q3 -What is the effect of this fragmenting?
A3 - Fragmenting ruins meat.

Then,

Q4 - Is all ruined meat visible?
A4 - Well yes and no. The heavy damage where extreme shock took place is visible once the hide is removed. This is noticeable due to blood vessels breaking.(Bruising) But some meat damage is not detecable until the animal is butchered. This can be bruising between muscle groups that wasn't visible until those groups were seperated. There can be "channeling" were a bullet fragment creates a channel right through the middle of say a rump roast.(This sometimes does not have a bruise along the channel.)I would cut that out due to the "shard" that could still be in there. I've seen fragments enter intestines, stomachs, and other organs to ruin the surrounding meat.

Trust me there is a difference. I've learned that it's true some things are over priced but in general you get what you pay for. I'm not trying to argue with anyone but there is a difference,believe it or not.

Sounds to me like the fusion is not an elk bullet regardless of what they say.
rather_be_huntin is offline  
Old 11-22-2006, 10:09 PM
  #37  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NW Colorado
Posts: 199
Default RE: Federal Fusion..NOT impressed

As stated in a few replies back and forth, I recall them advertising it as a deer sized animal cartridge bullet, but I think that was in a Field and Stream or Outdoor Life or one of the other advertisement magazines that include two articles for filler. Sorry to hear about your results on an elk with the bullet.

Now as to first hand experience, I have some: This year I wanted to shoot a deer with my cowboy guns, so I opted for my 38/357 Lever Gun. Marlin 357 Carbine to be exact. Had the gun sighted in at 100 yards dead on, open sights with the 357 Fusion's. Ended up shooting a large bodied Mule Deer Doe at 65 yards, shot when right where I wanted, punched the lungs, she went 5 yards and was down. I was VERY impressed with the results. Complete penetration and very decent wound channel, exit. Took one rib completly out and part of a second one as well.

Now about other bullet performance, Using my 338win mag and 225 Barnes TSX handloaded shot a cow elk, complete penetration at 394 yards. Dropped the elk where it stood, rolled down hill 5 yards. Dad shot his with same loads out of his 338, and we actually recovered the bullet in the hide under the skin on the back side. But she went about 20yards before going down. If I can get pictures I will post the pics in a different thread maybe.
Silver_Wolf is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hometheaterman
Guns
3
02-01-2009 09:27 AM
wis_bow_huntr
Firearm Review Forum
1
12-16-2008 01:55 PM
Sac
Guns
8
02-09-2008 09:20 AM
rochelle
Guns
3
02-10-2006 02:05 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Quick Reply: Federal Fusion..NOT impressed


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.