HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Young Hunters (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/young-hunters-13/)
-   -   doe (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/young-hunters/270347-doe.html)

Bocajnala 11-02-2008 02:50 PM

RE: doe
 
any common hunting rifle will penetrate the skull with no problem...thats not even an issue haha. We will all have our own oppinion, but yes it does kill deer. Dont specifically think"I only take head shots!!!" take what shots are given to you that are good. IF that happens to be a head at forty yards....well I have no problem with that an Ive done it four times.
-Jake

skybuster20ga 11-02-2008 04:15 PM

RE: doe
 
you do know i was being sarcastic right???

Siman08/OH 11-02-2008 04:38 PM

RE: doe
 
Every shot has pros and cons. But the head shot has a way LARGER margin of error then a heart/lung shot attempt. And about the empty spaces, with an arrow yes, it can happen (trust me i know), but with a gun, it wont. The damage a bullet does from a rifle will almost certainly sever something if you aim for the heart/lungs and make a good shot.

skybuster20ga 11-02-2008 04:54 PM

RE: doe
 
this was a major arguement in another forum. what some ppl dont understand is that in cetain parts of the country the deer densities are really low, 6 deer per sq mile such as where i live and hunt so its not like you see a deer every day you go out. and your only allowed one so when you get the chance at you take it. i hunted yesterday for our opener, granted i didnt ewant to shoot my deer yet and i was just scouting but i only see one doe and she was running away from me......had it been time to kill a deer you bet your azz i would have tried to drill her on the move. my point is, some of us cant or dont have the opertunity to get text book broad side shots.

Bocajnala 11-02-2008 10:38 PM

RE: doe
 

ORIGINAL: skybuster20ga

you do know i was being sarcastic right???
of course. I was referring to huntnteen. haha that .350 would have no problem penetrating any part of a deer.
-Jake

huntnteen 11-02-2008 10:42 PM

RE: doe
 
then his shot was perfectly ethical according to my standards. He took a legitimate shot at a vital zone of the deer, so you should all quit belittleing anyone who takes headshots

Rory/MO 11-03-2008 08:15 AM

RE: doe
 

ORIGINAL: huntnteen

what about the margin of error for that as well? if you shoot too high, but not high enough to get the spine then you have a wounded animal, if you shoot too low then you will have a wounded animal
I thought you didn't deer hunt?



ORIGINAL: skybuster20ga

HT is right. there is a dead spot w/ absolutley nothing vital at all behind the shoulder.
Mind expanding on that one Brandon?

Bocajnala 11-03-2008 08:27 AM

RE: doe
 
the dead spot is below the lungs and the rear of the heart..like from the heart back to the guts and below the lungs there is nothing. also, if you hit too high. I will try to find a diagram to post thats shows it.
-Jake

huntnteen 11-03-2008 08:28 AM

RE: doe
 
I dont deer hunt because i dont have a place to, i grew up with both parents deer hunting, and still put in for a tag every summer for the section of CA where we have mule deer. What im trying to do is defend the kid. I have grown up with my parents only taking heart or neck shots, and i will probley live to their standards once im in the feild, but it doesnt mean that i want someone to belittle a kid for a takeing a shot he knew could make, and killing a deer

Bocajnala 11-03-2008 08:30 AM

RE: doe
 
ok I found some stuff.




You can see it in those pictures. That is actually about a three to four inch area that is just tissue. and doesnt usually kill the deer. Especially with a bow. A bullet usually makes enough of a mess that it doesnt matter. but it is still an empty spot. Point being, ANYTIME you shoot an animal you risk injury.
-Jake


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:45 PM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.