liscense numbers on hunters for or against
12-05-2004 | 03:13 PM
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
From: minnesota USA
liscense numbers on hunters for or against
does your state require you to display a number on your back for hunting? 
in minn. we dont but i sure am glad wisconsin had it , thats how they caught chi vang, are you for or against this?
[:'(] or
---------------------------------------------------respones so far---
no numbers # MN. MS. OH. ILL. NEV. VA. Albert Can. OK. TX. KY. IN.
numbers required-- NJ. NY. WISC. PA.
------------------------------------------------------------------
very interestin answers not what i expected-----onebullet
in minn. we dont but i sure am glad wisconsin had it , thats how they caught chi vang, are you for or against this?[:'(] or
---------------------------------------------------respones so far---
no numbers # MN. MS. OH. ILL. NEV. VA. Albert Can. OK. TX. KY. IN.
numbers required-- NJ. NY. WISC. PA.
------------------------------------------------------------------
very interestin answers not what i expected--
---onebullet
12-05-2004 | 03:41 PM
#4
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,643
Likes: 0
From: the woods of NJ.
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
Jersey does and I don't mind. But someday I'll get stopped for not having it in plain view if I'm carrying my stand to or from my tree.[:'(] If that happens I may give up hunting. (in Jersey)[:'(][&o][>:][:@] or if I wear it on my back and when I get to my stand put on another jacket that I cary in. All I can say is TS.
12-05-2004 | 03:41 PM
#5
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,679
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin/Michigan
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
I'm all for it!!!!!!!!!! It caught the Vang character, imagine if Wi didn't have the back tag?? Then what would be going on in this case???? I couldn't imagine!
12-05-2004 | 03:54 PM
#6
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,667
Likes: 0
From: fort mcmurray alberta canada
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
Don't have it and it isn't necessary.One incident like the Vang case is not enough reason to implement such a system.Sort of like saying registering all guns is a good idea because it helped solve one crime.
12-05-2004 | 05:49 PM
#7
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 2,051
Likes: 0
From: NW Ohio , 5 min from Ottawa National / Magee Marsh
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
In Ohio we used to but now don't and glad . I lost my license 1 time when the pouch came off rabbit hunting , and can't remember how many times I forgot to move it from my small game bag or duck hunting coat to my camo for bow hunting. Also the pouch made noise when rubed against a tree , always at the worst times.
12-05-2004 | 06:02 PM
#8
Typical Buck
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 621
Likes: 0
From: Rockaway,NJ.
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
I like it! Here in Jersey you find a lot of people straying off thier property and on to yours! When you can see there # it gives you something to report to the proper authorities! If you hunting legal why would it bother you?
12-05-2004 | 06:30 PM
#10
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 391
Likes: 0
From: Rockland County, NY
RE: liscense numbers on hunters for or against
In NY, we have to, but it doesn't bother me. I never really thought about it. But the downside is, someone getting your numbers and reporting a false report.[:@] It happens.