Community
Whitetail Deer Hunting Gain a better understanding of the World's most popular big game animal and the techniques that will help you become a better deer hunter.

scope question

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-21-2004, 05:50 PM
  #1  
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Ponce de Leon Florida USA
Posts: 10,079
Default scope question

What kind of quality/light gathering ability difference would you have between the Zeiss Conquest 3x12x56 (1"tube) at about $920 and the Zeiss Diavari VM/V 3x12x56 (30mm tube) at about $1600? Is it worth the difference?
timbercruiser is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 04:29 AM
  #2  
Typical Buck
 
Hawgnman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 845
Default RE: scope question

The light gathering ability should be the same as they both have 56mm object lens. As to quality, I would call Zeiss and ask, "What do I get for the extra money?"
Hawgnman is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 06:32 AM
  #3  
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Georgia
Posts: 2,032
Default RE: scope question

this is where people dont know what they are talking about, yes the objective helps alot you will gather more light with a 56mm than a 40 mm, we all know that but a huge factor is the size of the tube and the kind of glass, these two are huge factors in price of a scope, tube is also huge in light gathering, hope this helps
trophyhuntr is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 10:07 AM
  #4  
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Bhm,Al
Posts: 7
Default RE: scope question

I personally don't think tube size matters one single bit. Most 30mm tubes have the 1" innards anyway. Good glass and exit pupil has more to do with it.IYAM.
It is my belief that the 30mm tube stuff is all hype, aimed (no pun intended) at selling scopes. For the most part, Eurpean scopes have been known to be the best made and they use a 30mm tube. Why? Cause they are on the metric system. Sure it may add a litte bit of strength (and weight), but I just can't see it doing any more than just that. My Leupolds with 1" tubes seem to be holding up just fine. Stick a 30mm tube on a cheap Tasco and you know what you got? Still a cheap Tasco that sux. With a 30mm tube of course.
hetuck is offline  
Old 01-22-2004, 10:27 AM
  #5  
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,921
Default RE: scope question

Yes objective makes a difference but the type/quality of lens used and coatings make up the meat on light transmission. The better the glass and coatings the less the objective will make for usable light transmission. Scope with superior coatings with smaller objectives will out perform those with larger objectives and low quality coatings. Comparing apples to apples it should be bigger objective more light but the human eye can only take some much light and the rest is wasted so it will become a point of diminshing returns. For most application good quality scopes of 40-50mm is all a biggame hunter needs for legal hours. By putting a large objective scope on you may change your shooting position which can result in poorer accuracy and scope crowding(which can lead to the ouch of be SF'd). This is subjective as some find med mounts to be perfect, while others find lower or higher to be aok. I just say this point so you take it into consideration before you purchase any scope(mount height and what it may or may not do to your shooting position.)

It is argued that a 30 mm should return more light than a 1", however the real benefits are internal strength and adjustment gains in the 30mm vs 1". The real difference is as stated above to get light transmission gains, not tube size. The advantage in tube size is so slight I would venture to say it is almost not measurable in light transmission on comparable glass and coatings.

The diavari is superior in glass and coatings so it should be brighter, clear, etc. I also would venture to say it's component make up would be more superior. This would account for the price difference. Is it worth it? Only you can make that call. Personally I wouldn't buy the diavari as the Conquest is all the scope I need for my hunting needs. I also would never buy a 56mm as my 40-50mm objectives of different manufacturer's is all I have ever needed for hunting in low light(legal times). While some are brighter not even the smaller objective's on my cheaper scopes have lost me in the field. Yes, some days it is too dark to distinguish and is legal but part of hunting is waiting for confirmation and that can mean not taking a shot, it is never a mistake in my mind not taking a shot that your not 100% confident in all aspects. I doubt in those rare cases any scope would have bought me the confirmation I needed to make the shot...I may be wrong just my opinion. Again it is personal and depends on your situation.

I would say do some research and take some boo's through the scopes available for your needs. The man who holds the check hold the desicion and everybody is different in what they need, want or see benefit in. Good Luck.
skeeter 7MM is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
NY ARCHER
Guns
11
01-17-2007 02:27 PM
dh4stretch3
Guns
1
09-26-2005 03:04 PM
Zen Archery
Small Game, Predator and Trapping
4
02-03-2005 05:01 PM
Prarie_Boy1
Guns
3
10-29-2004 08:10 AM
gobble stopper
Turkey Hunting
32
02-21-2002 11:10 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: scope question


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.