King's Buck being scored by B&C in Sept!
09-01-2012, 03:21 PM
#11
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ohio
Posts: 637
and the zaft buck is tagged and was in the pope and young records. he went to panel to verify the score and at panel they decided that the right tine originally scored as the g-3 was actually a non-typical tine because it had a common base with the g-2. ( exactly the same as the king buck) and therefore when they rescored the zaft buck he came out to a 173 incher. at which point Wayne did not agree and asked pope and young to pull his name. interesting enough the zaft buck was accepted into the canadian record book at 206
09-03-2012, 06:30 AM
#14
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Audubon & Red Rock, Penna.
Posts: 4,472
you will see that the point in question on the king buck not only has a common base with the g-2 it also is centered to the inside and not directly off the top.
09-03-2012, 07:41 AM
#15
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ohio
Posts: 637
09-03-2012, 09:05 AM
#16
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Allegan, MI
Posts: 8,019
"no doubt if the panel decides to score it as a typical there will be a new world record."
Have you guys not read the article? The Club has already had 3 dozen of their higher ups decide that the rack is a typical 6x6 with no abnormal points and the rack is going to be scored that way. The panel that scores it is being told to do it that way and when they do it will break the Milo Hansen record book buck by several inches if the numbers being given out on the initial scoring of it are close to what it is now. This panel is doing nothing but coming together to score it as a 6x6!!!
Have you guys not read the article? The Club has already had 3 dozen of their higher ups decide that the rack is a typical 6x6 with no abnormal points and the rack is going to be scored that way. The panel that scores it is being told to do it that way and when they do it will break the Milo Hansen record book buck by several inches if the numbers being given out on the initial scoring of it are close to what it is now. This panel is doing nothing but coming together to score it as a 6x6!!!
09-04-2012, 09:33 AM
#17
Banned
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: ohio
Posts: 637
nope haven't read it, but if what your saying is true, then it goes against everything I've ever read about how panel scoring goes.
The panel's main job is to discuss and decide how a rack needs to be scored, just like I stated before, the top 2 non-typicals switched places in the ranks just because 2 different panels judged them differently. however a non-typical point is a non-typical point no matter who measures it. If a point shares a base with another point it is a fork, therefore its non-typical. if a point does not come off top dead center of the main beam it is non-typical, so if they let this one slide it may or may not unseat the hanson buck, however it would bring on mass protests from other racks owners that are way down in the books due to the same discrepensies, and would result in totaly rewriting the record books in every category.
RR
The panel's main job is to discuss and decide how a rack needs to be scored, just like I stated before, the top 2 non-typicals switched places in the ranks just because 2 different panels judged them differently. however a non-typical point is a non-typical point no matter who measures it. If a point shares a base with another point it is a fork, therefore its non-typical. if a point does not come off top dead center of the main beam it is non-typical, so if they let this one slide it may or may not unseat the hanson buck, however it would bring on mass protests from other racks owners that are way down in the books due to the same discrepensies, and would result in totaly rewriting the record books in every category.
RR
