Score please.
10-19-2011 | 03:58 AM
#12
Fork Horn
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 336
Likes: 0
From: kansas
one thing i think is people get too tide up with is wide deer. yes a wide deer looks awesome on the wall but width is only one measurement. a deer with tine length and mass will get you a higher score then one width measurement. he has the tine length he carries his mass all the way through. then with the kickers you got a 155 give or a take a few inches deer. oh and above about a net score nets are for fish not deer.
10-19-2011 | 03:31 PM
#14
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,676
Likes: 0
From: elmira ny
Net, as well as gross, is a fact of life when measuring racks, like it or not My peeve with the scoring system is the fact that abnormal points result in deductions on typical score, yet a measurement of air- WIDTH- is allowed. I'll take a long main beam with mass any day since that represents nearly 40% or more of most racks scores. However, even gross, this buck doesn't reach 150 +. Helluva buck at any rate.
Last edited by crokit; 10-19-2011 at 03:38 PM.
10-19-2011 | 04:27 PM
#15
Fork Horn
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 432
Likes: 0
From:
that deer is 16 - 18 inches wide....id bet on it. Ear tip to ear tip on the average buck is 14inches wide.. id say this buck is likely 14 + ear tip to ear tip and his horns are outside his ears
