who likes T.R
03-22-2009 | 06:53 AM
#22
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,406
Likes: 0
From: New Hampshire
RE: who likes T.R
ORIGINAL: nathanyeck
jimmy s you are 1 BIG jurk there is nothing wrong with what i did now if i posted it 4 or 5 times then yes it would be wrong
you are a T.R LOVER any way so go take a hike
jimmy s you are 1 BIG jurk there is nothing wrong with what i did now if i posted it 4 or 5 times then yes it would be wrong
you are a T.R LOVER any way so go take a hike
I would have commented further, but I considered the source.
03-22-2009 | 10:47 AM
#23
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From:
RE: who likes T.R
ORIGINAL: srwshooter
the poll stiil proves most are tired of this and don't want the T.R crap. so they can try to sell books somewhere else.
the poll stiil proves most are tired of this and don't want the T.R crap. so they can try to sell books somewhere else.
and as was said nothing wrong with posting as long as it is not keep being posted
03-26-2009 | 09:09 AM
#26
Fork Horn
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
RE: who likes T.R
WP - Is there a point to this 7%. All that tells me is 7% of the viewers voted. The fact of the matter is of those that chose to vote 82% of them do not like to read about TR. Thats the % you should beaddressing. Let's normalize the data. If everyone responded then 552 people of 674 total people(82%) would have voted negative.
03-26-2009 | 10:14 AM
#27
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 214
Likes: 0
From:
RE: who likes T.R
ORIGINAL: rozman62
If everyone responded then 552 people of 674 total people(82%) would have voted negative.
If everyone responded then 552 people of 674 total people(82%) would have voted negative.
Maybe they would have voted in the positive.
Your logic is flawed
03-26-2009 | 03:13 PM
#28
Thread Starter
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
From:
RE: who likes T.R
ORIGINAL: WildlifePhoto
There is no evidence for that - cause they refused to participatein the poll.
Maybe they would have voted in the positive.
Your logic is flawed
ORIGINAL: rozman62
If everyone responded then 552 people of 674 total people(82%) would have voted negative.
If everyone responded then 552 people of 674 total people(82%) would have voted negative.
Maybe they would have voted in the positive.
Your logic is flawed
anyhow why did you bring this up again????
03-26-2009 | 03:54 PM
#30
Fork Horn
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Southern NH
RE: who likes T.R
WP - Normalizing data is just a way to say "what if" everyone voted what would the numbers be. Statistically once you have a data set of 20 points or greater then you can begin to normalize data with the probability that the % of acceptance and rejectionsshould be close to the base which is now 41 votes here. This is basic statistics.
Please do not make the statement that my logic is flawedusing a supportivestatementlike"Maybe they would have voted in the positive". Show me the data to support that statement as I showed youthe probability of what would of happened had everyone voted.Maybe and guessing are one of the same whichyou chose to do here.Kid -People will scrutinize you to the n-th degreeif you reply withthese types of subjective statements.
On a lighter note I have read some TR stuff and he is ok. On a scale of 1-10 I guess I would rate him a 6.
Please do not make the statement that my logic is flawedusing a supportivestatementlike"Maybe they would have voted in the positive". Show me the data to support that statement as I showed youthe probability of what would of happened had everyone voted.Maybe and guessing are one of the same whichyou chose to do here.Kid -People will scrutinize you to the n-th degreeif you reply withthese types of subjective statements.
On a lighter note I have read some TR stuff and he is ok. On a scale of 1-10 I guess I would rate him a 6.