But your job inFL may pay much more than a job in MT, but then you also have the FL COL.

I can sympathize with those who have to pay non-resident to hunt their home states. I live in Texas, but hunt Texas and Arkansas, my home state. I pay $300 a year to hunt fifteen miles from where I was raised. Then I get the locals tresspassing on my land/leases, because they know I'm not there all the time. Really sucks.

I don't really care and it isnt really any of my business whether the guy on the neighboring tract of land is NR. NR is kind of a broad term anyway since I was raised in Illinois and own land there, but am considered NR because i got an Ohio drivers license several years back. So, it always amuses me when a bunch of deer hunters with anti-Non Resident hunter bumper stickers on their trucks are parked in my dad's driveway in Illinois next to my car with Ohio plates.

The SouthDakotaHUnter asked what Minnesota charges for non-residents. Minnesota charges $26 for a resident firearms or archery deer license and $140 for a non-resident.

It's just as it implies. I never met anyone who had a foot run over by a semi.

Yourquestion and answer to mine doesn't make any sense. There are a lot of hunters who don't like n/r hunters coming into their state to hunt. I don't mind as I stated. Just as long as they pay for their tag and hunt ethically.Could the question be any simpler? I say like another poster did that we are all in this together. It isn't the n/r hunters who make the rules, they just take advantage of them, it's conservation departments.


What kind of question is that? That's like asking....Anyone else hate it when a semi-truck runs over your foot?
[/quote]


Spudrow from MO