Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)
11-20-2008 | 02:30 PM
#11
Typical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 744
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge Ohio USA
RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)
Now maybe you can tell me about that other deer I was apparently talking about.
Thats just not right. That deer should not be a world record. If a hunter did not kill it then it doesn't deserve it
I just cannot see a completely wild deer getting that big.
11-20-2008 | 04:16 PM
#12
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,335
Likes: 0
From: Roanoke, Virginia
RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)
ORIGINAL: M.Magis
Better?
I'm sure you can't. That doesn't mean they dont exist. Have you ever seen the record books?
Now maybe you can tell me about that other deer I was apparently talking about.
Thats just not right. That deer should not be a world record. If a hunter did not kill it then it doesn't deserve it
I just cannot see a completely wild deer getting that big.
There's no way thats a completely wild deer.
11-20-2008 | 04:45 PM
#13
Typical Buck
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 713
Likes: 0
From: Montrose, MI
RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)
ORIGINAL: wjbsmith
if thats the case johnny why would B & C have it on there website as being shot in Mo?
if thats the case johnny why would B & C have it on there website as being shot in Mo?
This massive buck is reported to have been taken by Roger Jarvis in Missouri. No other information about where or when it was taken is known.
The above is from the B & C website.The ranch that this buck was killed on claims to be free range, but unless Mr. Jarvis has contacted them (B&C) directly, its all speculation.I suspect they were e-mailed the story from someone. Did you click on the link I provided? The guy that posted the pic claims to have done work for Mr. Jarvis, who in the oil business.
11-20-2008 | 09:26 PM
#14
Fork Horn
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 114
Likes: 0
RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)
ORIGINAL: 1shotkill1993
How am I talking about two different deer.
I am talking about the one in the picture. I just cannot see a completely wild deer getting that big.
Thats all I'm saying. Now maybe you can tell me about that other deer I was apparently talking about.
ORIGINAL: M.Magis
Do you really have any idea what you're talking about? It sure seems like you're just replying to see your name. You're talking about two separate deer,and you don't seem to realize it. And just because you have never seen a deer like that, does that automatically mean they don't exist?
And I really doubt that that animal could of been wildly grown
I am talking about the one in the picture. I just cannot see a completely wild deer getting that big.
Thats all I'm saying. Now maybe you can tell me about that other deer I was apparently talking about.
simple. the current world record(which wasnt killed by a hunter) was brought up. then the 1 with the picture is the 1 that was recently killed and has the possibility of being the new world record.
and as far as growing them that big in the wild, the current wr was a free range deer. if the genetics are there and there is a good food supply then please tell me what could keep a deer from growing that big? what about that monster typical that was killed a few wks back, the field and stream buck, would you say it wasnt free range as well? they do exist in the wild my friend. they are just few and far between.
11-21-2008 | 12:42 AM
#15
Typical Buck
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
From: Starlight, Indiana
RE: Roger Jarvis Buck (possible new WR)
There are plenty of deer that would score over 200 inches, you just don't see them. To say that the deer was not wild is absurd. Do you believe in GOD? Have you ever seen him?
