$200,000+ for 3 Bucks
09-29-2007, 10:35 PM
#12
Nontypical Buck
Thread Starter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,785
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
I got an updated version of the story. It was 4 deer, not 3. The lawyer did kill a 300+" buck and also killed a 200+" buck himself, and his son did kill a 200+" buck. His hired hand's buck was ONLY 190+".
This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer (maybe there really is justice in the world).
This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer (maybe there really is justice in the world).
09-30-2007, 03:46 AM
#13
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location:
Posts: 583
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
IMO, if you spend that much to kill 4 deer, no matter the time situation, or lack of it, you're an idiot. I am sure you can findsome place, guided with all the extras for a quarter of that. But, since I can't even affod that 50,000 for 4 deer, I guess I don't know for sure.
09-30-2007, 05:07 AM
#15
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,876
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: retrieverman
My Dad pass along a story to my son and I last night about a local lawyer that took his son and a hired hand to somewhere in the midwest (Iowa or Illinois?) to shoot (NOT HUNT) 3 bucks. The lawyer killed a 300+" buck, his son killed a 200+" buck, and his hired hand killed a 190+" buck at a cost of OVER $200,000.
This all the info that was passed on to me, but I am curious if they took the halters off the deer before or after the shots.
My Dad pass along a story to my son and I last night about a local lawyer that took his son and a hired hand to somewhere in the midwest (Iowa or Illinois?) to shoot (NOT HUNT) 3 bucks. The lawyer killed a 300+" buck, his son killed a 200+" buck, and his hired hand killed a 190+" buck at a cost of OVER $200,000.
This all the info that was passed on to me, but I am curious if they took the halters off the deer before or after the shots.
09-30-2007, 05:16 AM
#17
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,876
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: retrieverman
This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer
This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer
09-30-2007, 07:03 AM
#18
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: VA
Posts: 1,921
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: Kybuckhunter
Its not for me but the guys has the money then good for him. He earned it so he should spend it how he wants. I hate these shooting preserves but I dont want to see the government telling me how I can spend my money. If there are people dumb enough to spend the money then I say go for it and die happy....
Its not for me but the guys has the money then good for him. He earned it so he should spend it how he wants. I hate these shooting preserves but I dont want to see the government telling me how I can spend my money. If there are people dumb enough to spend the money then I say go for it and die happy....
) scouting fees, etc. They guy couldn't shoot worth a darn and he said it was the worst client he's ever guided.
09-30-2007, 07:17 AM
#19
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Illinois
Posts: 2,828
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: retrieverman
I got an updated version of the story. It was 4 deer, not 3. The lawyer did kill a 300+" buck and also killed a 200+" buck himself, and his son did kill a 200+" buck. His hired hand's buck was ONLY 190+".
This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer (maybe there really is justice in the world).
I got an updated version of the story. It was 4 deer, not 3. The lawyer did kill a 300+" buck and also killed a 200+" buck himself, and his son did kill a 200+" buck. His hired hand's buck was ONLY 190+".
This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer (maybe there really is justice in the world).
09-30-2007, 08:46 AM
#20
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location:
Posts: 133
RE: $200,000+ for 3 Bucks
ORIGINAL: sjsfire
You my friend must have serious issues. I'm against this kind of hunting too. But, That is a terrible thing to say.
ORIGINAL: retrieverman
I got an updated version of the story. It was 4 deer, not 3. The lawyer did kill a 300+" buck and also killed a 200+" buck himself, and his son did kill a 200+" buck. His hired hand's buck was ONLY 190+".
This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer (maybe there really is justice in the world).
I got an updated version of the story. It was 4 deer, not 3. The lawyer did kill a 300+" buck and also killed a 200+" buck himself, and his son did kill a 200+" buck. His hired hand's buck was ONLY 190+".
This lawyer does have PLENTY of money and has the worst reputation of any in our area for being a shiester, and I also heard today that the guy is eat up with cancer (maybe there really is justice in the world).
I wouldn't kill a released pen deer, or a deer on a "reserve" but more power to a guy who wants to do it. His dollars and vote are on the same side of the issues that mine are... and that is what counts.