Community
Whitetail Deer Hunting Gain a better understanding of the World's most popular big game animal and the techniques that will help you become a better deer hunter.
View Poll Results: A poll
Hunt anyway.
88.76%
Find the first flight home.
11.24%
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll

Ethics Police - Question Time

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-27-2007 | 10:59 AM
  #51  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 129
Likes: 0
From: S. Indiana
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

High fence hunting makes me sick. It is for little boys who can't go out and find their own game.
bdosas is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-2007 | 11:08 AM
  #52  
quiksilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,716
Likes: 0
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

So now that we've got an ample survey - the next question is: Are you shocked by these results?

I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.

I knew the results would change a little bit once wedeveloped a scenario where you had to either hunt inside the fence, or eat the financial loss, but honestly, I thought it would've been closer to 50/50. Is this a situation where we're putting our ethics "for sale?"

I'm just as bad as the next guy, b/c I've said before that I wouldn't be caught dead hunting inside a fence. But, put a few of my own dollars on the line and I'd be right out there, gun-in-hand. LOL I definitely appreciate all the honest answers too. Strange ethical dilemma, definitely.
quiksilver is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-2007 | 11:48 AM
  #53  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

ORIGINAL: quiksilver

So now that we've got an ample survey - the next question is: Are you shocked by these results?

I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.

I knew the results would change a little bit once wedeveloped a scenario where you had to either hunt inside the fence, or eat the financial loss, but honestly, I thought it would've been closer to 50/50. Is this a situation where we're putting our ethics "for sale?"

I'm just as bad as the next guy, b/c I've said before that I wouldn't be caught dead hunting inside a fence. But, put a few of my own dollars on the line and I'd be right out there, gun-in-hand. LOL I definitely appreciate all the honest answers too. Strange ethical dilemma, definitely.
I think your way off base. (as usual). One your enclosure is larger than most people's hunting property, and chances of deer being locked in smaller areas on the east coast naturally is a pretty good chance. I would have changed my answer to go hunt, if I bothered to read your post carefully.

So, its not about putting ethics for sale. Its about not getting what you want or thought. Two totally different things.

I could care less if people hunt in enclosures. I won't do it. But I am not paying for peoples hunt.
 
Reply
Old 04-27-2007 | 01:02 PM
  #54  
quiksilver's Avatar
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,716
Likes: 0
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

I think your way off base. (as usual).
Am I? Sorry, BC, but I think it IS putting your ethics for sale. Please explain to me how it's not.
quiksilver is offline  
Reply
Old 04-27-2007 | 01:54 PM
  #55  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

ORIGINAL: quiksilver

I think your way off base. (as usual).
Am I? Sorry, BC, but I think it IS putting your ethics for sale. Please explain to me how it's not.
Um, I did. I bet that land you claim to hunt in Garrett county is locking deer out of less than your 3000 acres you talk about in Tx. Either by natural terrain, or fences (for livestock, or rivers) or other boundries that they prefer not to cross. I am sure you wanted to turn this into ethics, but you need to come up with a more intelligent scenerio to try to trap people into answering the question so you can sit there and say they are selling thier ethics and poke fun at them. You fall short. (As usual)
 
Reply
Old 04-27-2007 | 03:14 PM
  #56  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 0
From: Blissfield MI USA
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

I will answer you honestly. For starters, like I said I wouldn't pay to hunt. If it comes to me having to lease land to hunt I will quit, which may be very soon, like next year.

So lets say I did have the money and wanted to pay to hunt deer. Even if they advertised it as being a fenced in 18,000 acre ranch I would still do it. I would probably even do it at 3,000 acres. Those are huge areas and I don't blieve deer move around that much. Heck I'm used to hunting 9 or 10 acres (if that sometiems) with very limited places to set up successful stands.

When I think of canned or caged hunting I think of large numbers of domesticated deer in small areas where they cannot get away from you. Pretty much like shooting fish in a barrel. And to be honest I know people that still wouldn't be able tag out.

How would you feel about a ranch with no fences but the stands were pre set, the deer routes were known (probably baited or had food plots) and the guide drops you off at your stand or blind and comes back when you are done. Does this sound more like fair chase or less like fair chase? Does it sound like hunting, or just shooting deer? Its not the way I hunt I know that. Ethics are really hard to define aren't they.

Paul
Paul L Mohr is offline  
Reply
Old 04-28-2007 | 03:16 AM
  #57  
younggun308's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 4,266
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

ORIGINAL: retrieverman

ORIGINAL: younggun243

Nope, we didn't offer meat,'cause the neighbors hunt too.

Besides, we lease from the people anyway, and in a way, by paying them, we are giving them meat.
If you had shot 22 deer of MY 100 acre place, you would be hunting somewhere else next year.

For 22 deer, do you have walk in freezer at home?

No, it was all of us plus all the people we hunt with, we just killed a couple. And they have been killing 18, 20, 22 deer, (That's actually the order of the number of kills, and the deer population is fine.) every year for three-four year, they mostly rifle hunt.
younggun308 is offline  
Reply
Old 04-28-2007 | 06:34 AM
  #58  
falcon's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 11,410
Likes: 1
From: Comance county, OK
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

Hey, folks you are feeding the ego of a troll.
falcon is offline  
Reply
Old 04-29-2007 | 04:35 AM
  #59  
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11,477
Likes: 0
From:
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

Are you shocked by these results?

I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.
Very shocked at the results to be honest with you. For the record I see it is selling your ethics as well. Pretty easy conclusion IMO. Hunter A is against high fence hunting. Hunter A would hunt in an enclosure if he paid $3,000 and was duped into it. What else would you call it? It's a sell out. Justify it 1,000 different ways if you want. In the end you sold your ethics for a $3,000 bill.


I would probably even do it at 3,000 acres. Those are huge areas and I don't blieve deer move around that much.
Then why the need for a fence?


How would you feel about a ranch with no fences but the stands were pre set, the deer routes were known (probably baited or had food plots) and the guide drops you off at your stand or blind and comes back when you are done. Does this sound more like fair chase or less like fair chase? Does it sound like hunting, or just shooting deer? Its not the way I hunt I know that. Ethics are really hard to define aren't they.
Not that I would participate in either, but the difference is the deer has the option to go "over there" if it wanted to without running into a fence.
NY Bowhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 04-29-2007 | 05:58 AM
  #60  
Champlain Islander's Avatar
Dominant Buck
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 23,835
Likes: 10
From: On an Island in Paradise
Default RE: Ethics Police - Question Time

ORIGINAL: NY Bowhunter

If they told me it was fair chase and when I got there it wasn't, I'd simply get my money back and head back home.

If that wasn't possible (which I highly doubt) I'd be on a flight home regardless. I won't compromise my beliefs for $3,000.
I share your thoughts on the matter. You must feel great every day when you look in the mirror. Good for you taking that position. For all you young hunters think about what NY is saying andlearn.
Champlain Islander is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.