View Poll Results: A poll
Voters: 89. You may not vote on this poll
Ethics Police - Question Time
#52
So now that we've got an ample survey - the next question is: Are you shocked by these results?
I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.
I knew the results would change a little bit once wedeveloped a scenario where you had to either hunt inside the fence, or eat the financial loss, but honestly, I thought it would've been closer to 50/50. Is this a situation where we're putting our ethics "for sale?"
I'm just as bad as the next guy, b/c I've said before that I wouldn't be caught dead hunting inside a fence. But, put a few of my own dollars on the line and I'd be right out there, gun-in-hand. LOL I definitely appreciate all the honest answers too. Strange ethical dilemma, definitely.
I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.
I knew the results would change a little bit once wedeveloped a scenario where you had to either hunt inside the fence, or eat the financial loss, but honestly, I thought it would've been closer to 50/50. Is this a situation where we're putting our ethics "for sale?"
I'm just as bad as the next guy, b/c I've said before that I wouldn't be caught dead hunting inside a fence. But, put a few of my own dollars on the line and I'd be right out there, gun-in-hand. LOL I definitely appreciate all the honest answers too. Strange ethical dilemma, definitely.
#53
Guest
Posts: n/a
ORIGINAL: quiksilver
So now that we've got an ample survey - the next question is: Are you shocked by these results?
I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.
I knew the results would change a little bit once wedeveloped a scenario where you had to either hunt inside the fence, or eat the financial loss, but honestly, I thought it would've been closer to 50/50. Is this a situation where we're putting our ethics "for sale?"
I'm just as bad as the next guy, b/c I've said before that I wouldn't be caught dead hunting inside a fence. But, put a few of my own dollars on the line and I'd be right out there, gun-in-hand. LOL I definitely appreciate all the honest answers too. Strange ethical dilemma, definitely.
So now that we've got an ample survey - the next question is: Are you shocked by these results?
I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.
I knew the results would change a little bit once wedeveloped a scenario where you had to either hunt inside the fence, or eat the financial loss, but honestly, I thought it would've been closer to 50/50. Is this a situation where we're putting our ethics "for sale?"
I'm just as bad as the next guy, b/c I've said before that I wouldn't be caught dead hunting inside a fence. But, put a few of my own dollars on the line and I'd be right out there, gun-in-hand. LOL I definitely appreciate all the honest answers too. Strange ethical dilemma, definitely.
So, its not about putting ethics for sale. Its about not getting what you want or thought. Two totally different things.
I could care less if people hunt in enclosures. I won't do it. But I am not paying for peoples hunt.
#55
Guest
Posts: n/a
ORIGINAL: quiksilver
Am I? Sorry, BC, but I think it IS putting your ethics for sale. Please explain to me how it's not.
I think your way off base. (as usual).
#56
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,293
Likes: 0
From: Blissfield MI USA
I will answer you honestly. For starters, like I said I wouldn't pay to hunt. If it comes to me having to lease land to hunt I will quit, which may be very soon, like next year.
So lets say I did have the money and wanted to pay to hunt deer. Even if they advertised it as being a fenced in 18,000 acre ranch I would still do it. I would probably even do it at 3,000 acres. Those are huge areas and I don't blieve deer move around that much. Heck I'm used to hunting 9 or 10 acres (if that sometiems) with very limited places to set up successful stands.
When I think of canned or caged hunting I think of large numbers of domesticated deer in small areas where they cannot get away from you. Pretty much like shooting fish in a barrel. And to be honest I know people that still wouldn't be able tag out
.
How would you feel about a ranch with no fences but the stands were pre set, the deer routes were known (probably baited or had food plots) and the guide drops you off at your stand or blind and comes back when you are done. Does this sound more like fair chase or less like fair chase? Does it sound like hunting, or just shooting deer? Its not the way I hunt I know that. Ethics are really hard to define aren't they.
Paul
So lets say I did have the money and wanted to pay to hunt deer. Even if they advertised it as being a fenced in 18,000 acre ranch I would still do it. I would probably even do it at 3,000 acres. Those are huge areas and I don't blieve deer move around that much. Heck I'm used to hunting 9 or 10 acres (if that sometiems) with very limited places to set up successful stands.
When I think of canned or caged hunting I think of large numbers of domesticated deer in small areas where they cannot get away from you. Pretty much like shooting fish in a barrel. And to be honest I know people that still wouldn't be able tag out
.How would you feel about a ranch with no fences but the stands were pre set, the deer routes were known (probably baited or had food plots) and the guide drops you off at your stand or blind and comes back when you are done. Does this sound more like fair chase or less like fair chase? Does it sound like hunting, or just shooting deer? Its not the way I hunt I know that. Ethics are really hard to define aren't they.
Paul
#57
ORIGINAL: retrieverman
If you had shot 22 deer of MY 100 acre place, you would be hunting somewhere else next year.
For 22 deer, do you have walk in freezer at home?
ORIGINAL: younggun243
Nope, we didn't offer meat,'cause the neighbors hunt too.
Besides, we lease from the people anyway, and in a way, by paying them, we are giving them meat.
Nope, we didn't offer meat,'cause the neighbors hunt too.

Besides, we lease from the people anyway, and in a way, by paying them, we are giving them meat.
For 22 deer, do you have walk in freezer at home?
No, it was all of us plus all the people we hunt with, we just killed a couple. And they have been killing 18, 20, 22 deer, (That's actually the order of the number of kills, and the deer population is fine.) every year for three-four year, they mostly rifle hunt.
#59
Boone & Crockett
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 11,477
Likes: 0
From:
Are you shocked by these results?
I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.
I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.
I would probably even do it at 3,000 acres. Those are huge areas and I don't blieve deer move around that much.
How would you feel about a ranch with no fences but the stands were pre set, the deer routes were known (probably baited or had food plots) and the guide drops you off at your stand or blind and comes back when you are done. Does this sound more like fair chase or less like fair chase? Does it sound like hunting, or just shooting deer? Its not the way I hunt I know that. Ethics are really hard to define aren't they.
#60
ORIGINAL: NY Bowhunter
If they told me it was fair chase and when I got there it wasn't, I'd simply get my money back and head back home.
If that wasn't possible (which I highly doubt) I'd be on a flight home regardless. I won't compromise my beliefs for $3,000.
If they told me it was fair chase and when I got there it wasn't, I'd simply get my money back and head back home.
If that wasn't possible (which I highly doubt) I'd be on a flight home regardless. I won't compromise my beliefs for $3,000.








