ORIGINAL: quiksilver
So now that we've got an ample survey - the next question is: Are you shocked by these results?
I mean, we have 90+% of our members going on record to say that they would hunt inside an enclosure, given the circumstances.
I knew the results would change a little bit once wedeveloped a scenario where you had to either hunt inside the fence, or eat the financial loss, but honestly, I thought it would've been closer to 50/50. Is this a situation where we're putting our ethics "for sale?"
I'm just as bad as the next guy, b/c I've said before that I wouldn't be caught dead hunting inside a fence. But, put a few of my own dollars on the line and I'd be right out there, gun-in-hand. LOL I definitely appreciate all the honest answers too. Strange ethical dilemma, definitely.
I think your way off base. (as usual). One your enclosure is larger than most people's hunting property, and chances of deer being locked in smaller areas on the east coast naturally is a pretty good chance. I would have changed my answer to go hunt, if I bothered to read your post carefully.
So, its not about putting ethics for sale. Its about not getting what you want or thought. Two totally different things.
I could care less if people hunt in enclosures. I won't do it. But I am not paying for peoples hunt.