ok so ive saved up some money so i could get a new camera. i was thinking about cuddeback no flash but then i read some reviews on here and they didnt sound so hot in some. but then some they said that there amazing. so i dont know what to do. then some people said that the moultrie i 40 is just as good and much cheaper. then someone told me that the m.a.d calls wildlife eye is better then any of them. so some help on me deciding would be greatly apreciated. thanks

cudde no-flash! I like mine.

Reconyx, RC-55 IR.

I have seen alot of nice pictures from all of the cameras you mention.
It boils down to how much you can afford and the amount of risk you arewilling to take leaving the camera in the woods.
Personally, for the money I like theI40, its digital, ifrared and takes video or still pictures.

I havehad my I40out for a month and each time I switch out the SD card, it is like X-mas, you never know what you will get a picture of.

I must second the reccomendation for the Moultrie I-40. I just pulled mine from the woods and it was at 71 per cent battery life after being on since mid October.

Here's a saying that I picked up off another fourm, "Friends don't let friends buy Cuddeback."

I just bought a Moultrie I-40. Less than 1/2 the price of a Cuddeback noflash, 1/2 the trigger speed, twice the battery life....

On the cuddeback reference, that applies toany since the 2005 models.