Elitist attitude
#401
RE: Elitist attitude
ORIGINAL: LBR
Yep--like a flint lock muzzleloader, in-line muzzleloader, single-shot rifle, semi-auto rifle, and automatic rifle are all categorized differently because of some components.Nobody seems to have a problem understanding why you can't use a semi-auto in muzzleloader season, or a full auto in any season.
Yep--like a flint lock muzzleloader, in-line muzzleloader, single-shot rifle, semi-auto rifle, and automatic rifle are all categorized differently because of some components.Nobody seems to have a problem understanding why you can't use a semi-auto in muzzleloader season, or a full auto in any season.
In VA they made them legal during archery, good call IMO. But after reading some of the views on why they are not bows and should not be allowed I think they should have broken down the 6 week primitive weapons season even further. Instead of archery(bow/xbow) 6 weeks with the last 2 weeks also being BP they should have said you each get two weeks and they could have made it whatever order they wanted, xbow 1 week, bow 1 week, bp 1 weekthen repeat or just have xbow 2 weeks, bow 2 weeks, bp 2 weeks. How much belly aching would the "bow" hunters make over having to lose hunting time and share the woods even more, but the truth is bp hunters andxbow hunters are doing it alreadywhy should "bow" hunters be any different? Where does the sense of entitlement come from? I don't get it, I don't even want to really.
I hunt with my compound and my recurve, I lovethem both. I also welcome xbow hunters, there are plenty of woods and plenty of deer to kill and their presence has notaffected me in the least. I have shot lots of crossbows and enjoyed shooting them, I don't hunt with one yet but I can guarantee if there ever was a special xbow season in VA or NC I would ownandhunt with one for the same selfish reason I started bowhunting 18 years ago. I wanted more time to hunt, more hunting seasonto be out in the woods. A crossbow hunter should have the same oppurtunity to extend his season and hunt with his obviously primitive weapon during theprimitve weapons season(that's another change I would support call it primitive weapons season not archery seasonand break it down from there).JMO.
#402
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mississippi USA
Posts: 15,296
RE: Elitist attitude
The fact of the matter isit is a primitive weapon
How much belly aching would the "bow" hunters make over having to lose hunting time and share the woods even more, but the truth is bp hunters andxbow hunters are doing it alreadywhy should "bow" hunters be any different? Where does the sense of entitlement come from?
A crossbow hunter should have the same oppurtunity to extend his season and hunt with his obviously primitive weapon during theprimitve weapons season
#404
RE: Elitist attitude
I actually have read this entire thread(haven't figured out why yet) so I'm not sure what exactly your trying to imply. You were not the only person in this thread so the questions I posted (that largely went unanswered) were not meantfor just you. I did see the references to people fighting for archery season I am just not conviced that means"everything" anymore.Because archery season was establishedyears ago that means the seasons can't evolve tofit what hunting is now?And does it also meanthat anyone whowants evensmall changesis "riding coattails" and should just get their own season. Right, that makes perfect sense we should approach all thing in life with those blinders on.
Archery season is primative weapons season, there is no difference. So why should2 of the three primative weapons(bows/bp) have their own part of the whole primative seasonand thethird(xbows) has nothing and not only nothing butoppositionagainst beingincluded in the archery part of theprimitive weapons season that already exists and that it fits in(since it is a bow+). And what's worse is the opposition is from hunters. That's what I don't get. How does it effect you negativelyas a bow hunter ifcrossbow hunters are in the woods? Go ahead and tell me this has already been covered, I readit and the reasoning is shallow at best and just plain greedy at worst.
Ther are over 1,000,000 deer in VA. Crossbow hunters killed around 7,000 last season and other archery hunters around 17,000. Those pricks with xbowsare killing all the deer. Right, I mean they are if you don't count the other 993,000 +otherdeer that wererunning around the woods. There are plenty of deer to go around and the small numbers of xbow hunters have arelatively small impact on the big picture, I have no problem sharing the woods it just seems like the right thing(to me of course).
LBR trust me I get it. You don't like crossbows and don't want anyone using one in "bow" season. That is your opinion and you are certainly entitled to it, and while I can understand some of the points you make but to some degreeI don't think you are doing the same, everyhting is not alwayscut and dry black and white, especially with topics like this.
Archery season is primative weapons season, there is no difference. So why should2 of the three primative weapons(bows/bp) have their own part of the whole primative seasonand thethird(xbows) has nothing and not only nothing butoppositionagainst beingincluded in the archery part of theprimitive weapons season that already exists and that it fits in(since it is a bow+). And what's worse is the opposition is from hunters. That's what I don't get. How does it effect you negativelyas a bow hunter ifcrossbow hunters are in the woods? Go ahead and tell me this has already been covered, I readit and the reasoning is shallow at best and just plain greedy at worst.
Ther are over 1,000,000 deer in VA. Crossbow hunters killed around 7,000 last season and other archery hunters around 17,000. Those pricks with xbowsare killing all the deer. Right, I mean they are if you don't count the other 993,000 +otherdeer that wererunning around the woods. There are plenty of deer to go around and the small numbers of xbow hunters have arelatively small impact on the big picture, I have no problem sharing the woods it just seems like the right thing(to me of course).
LBR trust me I get it. You don't like crossbows and don't want anyone using one in "bow" season. That is your opinion and you are certainly entitled to it, and while I can understand some of the points you make but to some degreeI don't think you are doing the same, everyhting is not alwayscut and dry black and white, especially with topics like this.
#406
Boone & Crockett
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Mississippi USA
Posts: 15,296
RE: Elitist attitude
I actually have read this entire thread(haven't figured out why yet) so I'm not sure what exactly your trying to imply.
Because archery season was establishedyears ago that means the seasons can't evolve tofit what hunting is now?And does it also meanthat anyone whowants evensmall changesis "riding coattails" and should just get their own season. Right, that makes perfect sense we should approach all thing in life with those blinders on.
Archery season is primative weapons season, there is no difference.
So why should2 of the three primative weapons(bows/bp) have their own part of the whole primative seasonand thethird(xbows) has nothing and not only nothing butoppositionagainst beingincluded in the archery part of theprimitive weapons season that already exists and that it fits in(since it is a bow+).
How does it effect you negativelyas a bow hunter ifcrossbow hunters are in the woods? Go ahead and tell me this has already been covered, I readit and the reasoning is shallow at best and just plain greedy at worst.
LBR trust me I get it.
At the risk of dragging out a ridiculously long thread even more, here's how I see it.
There's a very few die-hard crossbow enthusiasts who enjoy the weapon for the spirit of the weapon--like Wyvern and Art, who have gone as far as building true primitive replicas of the weapons. I can respect that, but they are a tiny fraction of a fraction of the minority, and even though that is the type hunter that could get a season established for them, there's not anywhere near enough of them to get anything done. Life ain't fair. They can at least use their weapon of choice in primitive weapons season, and in at least some states during gun season.
You have another small fraction, although much larger than the above still small, of disabled and elderly hunters who honestly cannot physically shoot a bow. Most states (including MS) have provisions for those people and allow them to use crossbows during archery season. I can live with that.
The majority of what's left are people who don't want to bother learning to shoot a bow and/or think the crossbow is a magical weapon far superior to a bow (it's not), but want to extend their hunting season beyond rifle and primitiveweaponsseasons. They don't care to work for getting their own season established, so the only thing left is to try to barge in on the short period of time that only bows are allowed in the hunting woods.
We have the shortest amount of time allotted for specific weapons seasons, and we generally have the least desireable time of the season (at least we do in MS). Yet because we want to keep the season what it is, and what it was fought for and established for, we are just shallow,greedy and selfish? Give me a break.......
Hey, your granddad worked his butt off all his life, made sacrifices, and thanks to him your father and now youare able to live a comfortable life. The next guy comes along, his granddad didn't do the work and make the sacrifices, neither did his dad, and now he isn't willing to either--but he wants you to give him an equal part of what's yours. Are you going to split what you have with him right down the middle just because he wants it? Or are you one of those shallow, greedy, selfish types?
Chad
#408
Banned
Thread Starter
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Obama made me join the NRA for 5 years !
Posts: 2,181
RE: Elitist attitude
That is a battle you absolutely can not win, so why bother?
We can and have stopped xbows.... We can win that battle.. Sure, maybe there isn't much difference between a tricked out compound and an xbow, but I still percieve the xbow as an easier weapon to use and we HAVE to draw the line somewhere..
But you can still keep the challenge alive while shooting a compound....
question Double Creek - a recurve with peep, sights and mechanical release ....... same thing as a compound then for the most part ?
Do you use a recurve because it is easier than a longbow?
Fact is you don't know the answer, you just know your answers and think they are everyone's answers .
it is more a desire to achieve a different hunting aesthetic, to try and hunt in a way more in tune with the prey and the surrounding forest. But, based on what you have said, that isn't why you bowhunt, is it?
If you need to boost your self-esteem by thinking thatthe manner in whichyou hunt is more difficult and therefore makes you a "better hunter" than others, that's fine
they GOT you the season you're in now, and compounds weren't a part of that club. Rule were changed to allow them.
brucelanthier I do not sugar coat things. I don't ***** foot around and watch stepping on toes. Its the internet, I mean geeeeeeesh, we're having a friendly debate, talking, making a few jabs etc but in truth at its core, we ARE talking about a very important issue, one thats been around for a long time and seems to never go away.
I KNOW the guy who makes his own bows and arrows and trade points is a more dedicated bowhunter than me. I know that, its 100% FACT. Its why very few do. I also know trad bowhunting is very much harder than compound shooting, thats why most shoot compounds, its EASIER. Duh, thats human nature, and its what our society has devleoped into - the easier the better. Rifle hunting is easier still.
That aint debateable, its fact, proven by looking at kill stats, who uses what and the record books, who's killing the most big animals etc.
What gets people is being lumped into the groups thats above others, and being told they hunt "easier". People don't like to hear that, as true as it is.
NEW61375 Arkansas has 5 monhts of bowhunting including crossbows. We don't need a special season for them, for compound for recurves or for longbows.
LBR
Adding a weapon to a season is totally different than having a separate season addedfor a particular type weapon
The fastest, quiestes, most accurate bows in the Arkansas woods every fall aint crossbows LBR and we allow them. Its compounds. THEY are the most superior weapon in the woods, thats why people choose to shoot them.
Realizing that, and using your logic, compounds would be the more advanced, technolgoical weapon and they need THEIR OWN season.
But we manage to handle it well, as do all states that allow crossbows. Come to find it, it doesn't bring any negatives at all.
IMO, it's a bow-plus
I mean geeeeesh, you consider the above a bow ? Its not hand drawn, you don't have to draw it in the presence of game, its very likely 85% letoff or more, sights, triggers ....... THATS a bow ?
I do understand your argument. I also understand its based on a sliver of difference between how a crossbow and a compound works, its P&Y's staple argument, but in truth, where allowed, crossbows have never been the demon they've been made out to be in FACT compounds brought in millions more than crossbows ever did, more accidents, more questionable characters using them and more "be a two season hunter" kind of guys.
Sorry compounders, its the truth.
LBR - If its TRUELY all about drawing the bow, then you HAVE to be against the compound bow-pluses because they breach what drawing a bow is all about, the triggers and the high let offs. Remember, you still have to draw a crossbow too, they don't self draw
Early archery pioneers worked hard to get an ARCHERY season established, for simple bows and arrows. Others have come along and chipped away at it, riding coattails and not working for their own season. I don't understand the "sense of entitlement" either--it's coming from those who haven't had anyone work to get a season established, but rather just try to get added into a season someone else worked to get for a different weapon.
FYI crossbows were here thousand years before compounds FYI
I will also work to keep the archery season just that--archery season.
Archery season--bows and arrows. That's what it was established for.
We (archery hunters) lost two weeks of our season to primitive weapons season a few years ago
. They can be used during the archery season with a valid permit.
NEW61375 and here's the kicker - NEVER not ONCE has crossbows being legal led to a negative. Never. Anti-crossbow people will argue until they're blue in the face, and they cannot produce one fact to use to say crossbows can't come in. Not one. That lack of fact is why I lean toawrds allowing all bows until the point comes (if it ever does) of HAVING to do something simply because of too many animals being killed or maybe too manyhunters.
Never has that happened though
#409
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Moravia NY USA
Posts: 2,164
RE: Elitist attitude
Yep--like a flint lock muzzleloader, in-line muzzleloader, single-shot rifle, semi-auto rifle, and automatic rifle are all categorized differently because of some components.Nobody seems to have a problem understanding why you can't use a semi-auto in muzzleloader season, or a full auto in any season.
Powder/bang is what seperates them.
Putting the crossbow(archery) in the archery season has not hurt one bow season anywhere it has been done.
To argue putting an archery (string powered - no powder/bang) weapon into archery season will somehow give relevance to primitive guns (powder/bang) being allowed in archery follows no logic at all - in my mind.
Steve
#410
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location:
Posts: 478
RE: Elitist attitude
"If the UBP fought to ban Xbows in archery season,they must have a good reason!"
Ummm...no, that does not mean anything other than they had"A reason". Good,bad, selfish, for the good of all archers...the "reason" iswhat this debate is about. I appreciate that bowhutners want to keep it "bowhunting"( right there with ya), but excluding a bow simply because it is diferent and does not fall under "your definition" is such a waste of time. You reduce the ranks of bowhunters, give more reason for the states to open up more time to gun hunters to control the herds, and base most of yourreasons on assumptions and outright lies about crossbows and what they can/cant do and what kind of people use them. I have to deal with this attitude at the bowhunter ed level in my states. I have such a bunch of idiots wandering around with $1200 compounds refusing to teach crossbow safety (required in my state mind you) because they are "not a bow". Most have never even shot a crossbow(refuse to)and dont know its limitations. Groups like the PBS need to get their heads out of their *** and actually do something constructive for bowhunting for a change...
Wyvern
Ummm...no, that does not mean anything other than they had"A reason". Good,bad, selfish, for the good of all archers...the "reason" iswhat this debate is about. I appreciate that bowhutners want to keep it "bowhunting"( right there with ya), but excluding a bow simply because it is diferent and does not fall under "your definition" is such a waste of time. You reduce the ranks of bowhunters, give more reason for the states to open up more time to gun hunters to control the herds, and base most of yourreasons on assumptions and outright lies about crossbows and what they can/cant do and what kind of people use them. I have to deal with this attitude at the bowhunter ed level in my states. I have such a bunch of idiots wandering around with $1200 compounds refusing to teach crossbow safety (required in my state mind you) because they are "not a bow". Most have never even shot a crossbow(refuse to)and dont know its limitations. Groups like the PBS need to get their heads out of their *** and actually do something constructive for bowhunting for a change...
Wyvern