Technical Find or ask for all the information on setting up, tuning, and shooting your bow. If it's the technical side of archery, you'll find it here.

This just in- Physics proves WB superior

Old 06-21-2004 | 02:05 PM
  #101  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,398
Likes: 0
From: Eastern PA USA
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior

I'm sorry, but can someone tell me what this thread is about?[8D]
JOE PA is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2004 | 03:05 PM
  #102  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,457
Likes: 0
From: East Yapank NY USA
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior



Rack-attack is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2004 | 03:25 PM
  #103  
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 9,175
Likes: 0
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior

I'm sorry, but can someone tell me what this thread is about?
Certainly! It's about 4 pages too long.[8D]
Arthur P is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2004 | 04:35 PM
  #104  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,862
Likes: 0
From: Illinois
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior

Certainly! It's about 4 pages too long.


For those who believe some are telling others (directly) not to use the rest or they are crazy if they do, I don't see that. I do see a lot being said about the known or suspected pros and cons of the rest and the design of the rest vs. performance and maintainance.

atlas:

You are so inexperienced, much of what you often suggest, relate, and debate; is usually wrong on most points most of the time. There! That satisfy your wondering about the "funny part?" May not be what I truly believe, but you constantly invite a berating.
c903 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2004 | 04:53 PM
  #105  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior

ORIGINAL: c903

atlas:

You are so inexperienced, much of what you often suggest, relate, and debate; is usually wrong on most points most of the time. There! That satisfy your wondering about the "funny part?" May not be what I truly believe, but you constantly invite a berating.
Please oh wise one.............examples. What have I missed in the 20+ years I have spent in the woods that makes me so inexperienced??

Tell me........better yet, show me when and where I have ever given out advice on this board that was incorrect. Pick any topic, shooting, tracking, stands, bows, arrows, broadheads, scents, clothing, KE................anything. Show me exactly where I said something blatantly wrong (while acting like I was a know-it-all).

Shouldn't be too hard since you say I do it constantly.
atlasman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2004 | 04:58 PM
  #106  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior

While you're at it why don't you tell everyone here when exactly we are considered "experienced" enough to speak in your presence??


You seem to have appointed yourself judge of people's credibility based solely on X's on the calander so please let us all know when we reach that magical day when we get to sit at the grown-ups table
atlasman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2004 | 05:25 PM
  #107  
Bigpapascout's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,161
Likes: 0
From: In Teh Garage (Rossville, GA USA)
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior

Atlasman

your Ignorance of HCA and Archery Pro LLC would be a good excuse for your defence of talking out of line about the how we intend to market the equipment.

You are right most of the industry does require a 5 grain per pound limit but HCA Nor AP ADhear to that because we have been testing these bows to for years with sub 5 grain weight arrows and If there was a liability issue we certanly would not market these bows encouraging people to shoot less than 5 grains per pound arrows.

I really dont care what your prefrence of equipment is but when you come on here blasting me about how I do business is really none of your business!
If someone asks me what I think is the best rest I will not lie to them and tell them that it is the WB when I know first hand it is not.

what I am seeing is a wiskerbiscuit user who is pissed because someone dont like it as much as you do.
one other thing you are exactly right I do think it is a piece of S#!t
but if customers want to use that is fine by me because I know that they will be back because I was honest when they ask my opinoin of the rest
whether it be to get new fletching put on their arrows or to buy a better rest.

you know what you know and that is all you know
it wouldnt hurt you to do a little thinking out side of the box and keep your mouth shut about concepts you dont have a clue of what you are talking about bud


and that goes for a few others too
I am done with this topic so any thing adressed to me would be better off sent via PM
Bigpapascout is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2004 | 06:10 PM
  #108  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 4,668
Likes: 0
From: NY
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior

ORIGINAL: Bigpapascout

Atlasman

your Ignorance of HCA and Archery Pro LLC would be a good excuse for your defence of talking out of line about the how we intend to market the equipment.
Talking out of line about HCA?? Ignorance?? How did you get that from this.....

ORIGINAL: atlasman

Your credibility becomes an issue for 2 reasons. First you are saying something that goes against a foundational rule that is followed by the entire industry currently. Doesn't mean that won't change someday and you may be right...........but it does raise a few eyebrows because of the danger involved with all that energy going into the bow and not the arrow. Thousands of shots with no problems won't mean a thing if that bow blows up and peels half your skull away with it.

In a nutshell I said telling people to do something that 99% of the archery world views as dangerous is gonna turn a few heads and people will be naturally skeptical and cautious.

Geesh........I even said you may be right!!.............your cool, calm response to even the mildest opposing opinion is very reassuring



You are right most of the industry does require a 5 grain per pound limit
Then what are you biting my head off for???........that's all I said.


I really dont care what your prefrence of equipment is but when you come on here blasting me about how I do business is really none of your business!
You do know that when you structure a sentence like that using "but" it negates everything before it right?? Kinda like Bill Parcells recently saying "No offense to Orientals "but".........then proceeding to offend them.

So a better way to phrase your sentence would have been I DO care what your preference of equipment is..............and did I "blast" you about how you do business??


If someone asks me what I think is the best rest I will not lie to them and tell them that it is the WB when I know first hand it is not.
It doesn't appear to be something you know...........it seems to be more of an opinion....a personal choice. Which is fine as long as the customer knows this.


what I am seeing is a wiskerbiscuit user who is pissed because someone dont like it as much as you do.
What have I said to make you think I am "pissed"???

Why would I care what other people shoot?? I know how I shoot and I know how well my equipment works..........and nothing else matters to me.

You on the other hand are in a position of influence (right or wrong) because many people will ask you your opinion about products. You have shown not only an incredible personal bias but also a very closed minded nature to anything outside YOUR likes.



one other thing you are exactly right I do think it is a piece of S#!t
And there you have it..........sums it up pretty nicely. We all knew that it was in there, I don't know why you tried so hard to hide it


but if customers want to use that is fine by me because I know that they will be back because I was honest when they ask my opinoin of the rest
whether it be to get new fletching put on their arrows or to buy a better rest.
All I can say is I'm glad you don't work around here. How about checking their bow tune (or doing it right the first time) or selling better vanes and stocking some current merchandise like the B2 WB so fletch wear won't even be an issue.................or do you like saying "I told you so" when people come in to get more vanes??



keep your mouth shut about concepts you dont have a clue of what you are talking about bud
If you think I am the only person who isn't crazy about shooting 3.5 grains/lb then you haven't read the thread very well.


I am done with this topic so any thing adressed to me would be better off sent via PM

Ranting and then grabbing your ball and running home...................CLASSIC!!!!
atlasman is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2004 | 06:22 PM
  #109  
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 110
Likes: 0
From: saint marys wv USA
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior

I went to school with a guy we called that[8D] Long story
Bigbuckslayer3 is offline  
Reply
Old 06-21-2004 | 07:42 PM
  #110  
ijimmy's Avatar
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,890
Likes: 0
From: WEST PALM FLORIDA
Default RE: This just in- Physics proves WB superior

Now this is entertainment
ijimmy is offline  
Reply

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.