String supressors??
06-04-2008 | 09:18 PM
#31
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 0
From:
RE: String supressors??
ORIGINAL: Old/New
I agree. The STS has the potential for providing more consistancy therefore better acuracy though that is probably difficult to measure.
Some also say since the string does not stay with the arrow as long it could help with any "blip" you make. The down side is because of the same reason you could lose a tad bit of speed (though some say they measured and foundno appreciable difference).
ORIGINAL: MeanV2
Watch slow motion video. The Arrow is not off the string at BH without a Suppressor. Some claim that the arrow leaves the string at the same point every time with a suppressor installed making the shot more consistent.
Not so without one!
Dan
Watch slow motion video. The Arrow is not off the string at BH without a Suppressor. Some claim that the arrow leaves the string at the same point every time with a suppressor installed making the shot more consistent.
Not so without one!
Dan
I agree. The STS has the potential for providing more consistancy therefore better acuracy though that is probably difficult to measure.
Some also say since the string does not stay with the arrow as long it could help with any "blip" you make. The down side is because of the same reason you could lose a tad bit of speed (though some say they measured and foundno appreciable difference).
I said "Some Claim"
Because I know on the forums several will argue about anything so I didn't want to make any definite statements without Lab reports to back it up!![8D]
Dan
06-04-2008 | 09:37 PM
#32
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,251
Likes: 0
From: ELK GROVE CA USA
RE: String supressors??
I am sorry...I was not try to fight a battle nor say that this product was not to what you say it is. I am just simply curious,that is all,nothing more...I am sorry if I offended you,this was not my goal. I was just trying to understand the product a bit more.
you say that many claim that there shooting has improved, do you think it is what was said above about helping the possible "blip"??
you say that many claim that there shooting has improved, do you think it is what was said above about helping the possible "blip"??
06-05-2008 | 11:44 AM
#34
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 0
From: Hughesville, PA
RE: String supressors??
ORIGINAL: y2khog
Bowtecben, what bow is that supressor on? Is that your 101?
Bowtecben, what bow is that supressor on? Is that your 101?
06-05-2008 | 01:05 PM
#36
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 7,367
Likes: 0
From:
RE: String supressors??
ORIGINAL: y2khog
Ben, no issues with removing the roller? It looks like it would wear the paint off pretty quick as well as add some friction.
Ben, no issues with removing the roller? It looks like it would wear the paint off pretty quick as well as add some friction.
Dan
06-05-2008 | 01:09 PM
#37
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 2,590
Likes: 0
From: Hughesville, PA
RE: String supressors??
ORIGINAL: MeanV2
You don't remove the Roller guard. Ben put his MeanV on the lower mount hole
Dan
ORIGINAL: y2khog
Ben, no issues with removing the roller? It looks like it would wear the paint off pretty quick as well as add some friction.
Ben, no issues with removing the roller? It looks like it would wear the paint off pretty quick as well as add some friction.
Dan
Love this set up....I also loved the Mean V on the Commander that I had too.
06-05-2008 | 06:50 PM
#39
Typical Buck
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 552
Likes: 0
From: Long Island, NY
RE: String supressors??
For the record I have Dan's string supressor on my Liberty. I think it's made quite a difference!
Correction...I know it's made quite a difference. I just like to mention what others say about SSTs in general.
Correction...I know it's made quite a difference. I just like to mention what others say about SSTs in general.
