Relatively stupid question.
#11
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,877
Likes: 0
From: Kodiak, AK
ORIGINAL: Washington Hunter
Well, nevermind. Looks like I can't shoot an arrow weighing less than 420 grains, anyhow. Good thing I looked at the regs again.
Washington is a 6gpp state.
Lame.
Well, nevermind. Looks like I can't shoot an arrow weighing less than 420 grains, anyhow. Good thing I looked at the regs again.
Washington is a 6gpp state.
Lame.
#12
ORIGINAL: KodiakArcher
Not that I'm advocating it but has anyone ever seen an officer in the field with a scale?
ORIGINAL: Washington Hunter
Well, nevermind. Looks like I can't shoot an arrow weighing less than 420 grains, anyhow. Good thing I looked at the regs again.
Washington is a 6gpp state.
Lame.
Well, nevermind. Looks like I can't shoot an arrow weighing less than 420 grains, anyhow. Good thing I looked at the regs again.
Washington is a 6gpp state.
Lame.
Unless I got stopped by a warden in his most pissed off mood, the chances of him weighing my arrows are slim to none.
I don't know...
#13
Here is the trajectory of basically the same speeds and weights you were thinking about.
There isn't much difference when you look at just the hit/miss distance within a kill zone at 40 yards.
Not even 2" difference at the apex of the arc when the 40 yard pin is used.
365 gr arrow at 305 fps
There isn't much difference when you look at just the hit/miss distance within a kill zone at 40 yards.
Not even 2" difference at the apex of the arc when the 40 yard pin is used.
365 gr arrow at 305 fps
#14
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 2,413
Likes: 0
From:
Unless I got stopped by a warden in his most pissed off mood, the chances of him weighing my arrows are slim to none.




