Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Reloading
CT Partition vs Partition >

CT Partition vs Partition

Community
Reloading Share techniques for reloading, where to get the hottest in reloading equipment and learn how to reload from fellow hunters.

CT Partition vs Partition

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-12-2002, 09:48 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Colorado Springs CO USA
Posts: 52
Default CT Partition vs Partition

I was wondering if anybody has switched over from standard Partitions to the CT Partition. Or if anybody uses the CT line how is the accuracy compared to standard Partitions ? Is that Moly coating actually doing anything significant ? Anybody have any actual field reports on how they performed ? Thanks in advance.
FlatTop is offline  
Old 08-12-2002, 09:59 AM
  #2  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

I use both in a 300 win mag and a 300 wsm....they shoot about the same as regular partitions in the 300 win mag and the 300 wsm likes the regular partitions.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Old 08-12-2002, 10:01 AM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

Sorry I am not using the molycoated bullets..
oldelkhunter is offline  
Old 08-19-2002, 10:24 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Little Egg harbor NJ
Posts: 1,279
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

Excuse my ignorance what is a ct partition?

Brian

445 supermag is offline  
Old 08-20-2002, 03:14 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oakland OR USA
Posts: 2,929
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

CT =Combined Tecnologies ,A hybrid bullet developed by winchester and Nosler to compete with the Barnes bullet .
halcon is offline  
Old 08-20-2002, 08:17 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sellersville Arkansas USA
Posts: 22
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

Besides the "LubaloX" (moly) coating, there are also differences in the jackets, and the CT Partition has a steel cup around the rear lead core.
wingnut is offline  
Old 08-20-2002, 10:22 PM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Little Egg harbor NJ
Posts: 1,279
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

halcon and wingnut. I just got the winchester catalog and I now see. thanks for the info. It seems to me that the ct partition looks like it has a thicker forward jacket than the nosler too. Am I right in seeing this too? Probable a better bullet then the nosler too. Does anyone have any real world experience with this bullet on animals. I bet it would retain more weight then the nosler.

brian

445 supermag is offline  
Old 08-21-2002, 09:38 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,585
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Old 08-22-2002, 11:01 AM
  #9  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

Bear in mind that Lazzeroni buys undersized regular partitions and then plates them to specs. He refuses to use CT partition.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 04:35 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,585
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  


Quick Reply: CT Partition vs Partition


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.