Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Firearms Forum > Reloading
CT Partition vs Partition >

CT Partition vs Partition

Reloading Share techniques for reloading, where to get the hottest in reloading equipment and learn how to reload from fellow hunters.

CT Partition vs Partition

Old 08-12-2002, 09:48 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Colorado Springs CO USA
Posts: 52
Default CT Partition vs Partition

I was wondering if anybody has switched over from standard Partitions to the CT Partition. Or if anybody uses the CT line how is the accuracy compared to standard Partitions ? Is that Moly coating actually doing anything significant ? Anybody have any actual field reports on how they performed ? Thanks in advance.
FlatTop is offline  
Old 08-12-2002, 09:59 AM
  #2  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

I use both in a 300 win mag and a 300 wsm....they shoot about the same as regular partitions in the 300 win mag and the 300 wsm likes the regular partitions.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Old 08-12-2002, 10:01 AM
  #3  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

Sorry I am not using the molycoated bullets..
oldelkhunter is offline  
Old 08-19-2002, 10:24 PM
  #4  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Little Egg harbor NJ
Posts: 1,279
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

Excuse my ignorance what is a ct partition?

Brian

445 supermag is offline  
Old 08-20-2002, 03:14 PM
  #5  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Oakland OR USA
Posts: 2,929
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

CT =Combined Tecnologies ,A hybrid bullet developed by winchester and Nosler to compete with the Barnes bullet .
halcon is offline  
Old 08-20-2002, 08:17 PM
  #6  
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Sellersville Arkansas USA
Posts: 22
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

Besides the "LubaloX" (moly) coating, there are also differences in the jackets, and the CT Partition has a steel cup around the rear lead core.
wingnut is offline  
Old 08-20-2002, 10:22 PM
  #7  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Little Egg harbor NJ
Posts: 1,279
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

halcon and wingnut. I just got the winchester catalog and I now see. thanks for the info. It seems to me that the ct partition looks like it has a thicker forward jacket than the nosler too. Am I right in seeing this too? Probable a better bullet then the nosler too. Does anyone have any real world experience with this bullet on animals. I bet it would retain more weight then the nosler.

brian

445 supermag is offline  
Old 08-21-2002, 09:38 PM
  #8  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,585
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  
Old 08-22-2002, 11:01 AM
  #9  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: CT Partition vs Partition

Bear in mind that Lazzeroni buys undersized regular partitions and then plates them to specs. He refuses to use CT partition.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Old 09-18-2002, 04:35 PM
  #10  
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 27,585
Default [Deleted]

[Deleted by Admins]
Deleted User is offline  

Quick Reply: CT Partition vs Partition


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.