Community
Reloading Share techniques for reloading, where to get the hottest in reloading equipment and learn how to reload from fellow hunters.

.260 Rem didn't perform well.

Thread Tools
 
Old 01-11-2009 | 06:46 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Spike
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
From: Rockbridge co. VA
Default .260 Rem didn't perform well.

I worked up a load of 40gr of IMR4350 with a 140gr GameKing this past fall. I used the IMR4350 simply b/c I had a full can of it. I didn't really get the accuracy I was hoping for, about a 1.5" @ 100yds,and ran out of time to do any more test loads(it was time to hunt!) Anyhow I came on here a couple years ago and was asking about loads for this round but lost the paper I wrote them down on. If I remember right VARGET was mentioned as being a good powder for the .260. Any help on which way I should go? The 40gr of 4350 was right in the middle load that my manual suggested. Should I work with the 4350 a little more, or try some different powder? This lil gun was tack driver with stock Core-lokts, I just want that same tack-driver with handloads as this is my go-to gun. thanks.
Kbeaner is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2009 | 08:22 AM
  #2  
bronko22000's Avatar
Boone & Crockett
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 12,823
Likes: 4
From: Eastern PA
Default RE: .260 Rem didn't perform well.

Man I wish I could help you. The 260 Rem always intrigued me but I never owned one. Hopefully someone else can help you out. In the interim, you cna search Hodgen's reloading manual on line for some load info. Funny, IMR4350 seems to work well with cases similar to the 260.
bronko22000 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2009 | 08:36 AM
  #3  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 178
Likes: 0
From: kentucky
Default RE: .260 Rem didn't perform well.

according to speer manual#14 start charge with imr 4350 should be 41.0 gr. have you tried bumping up/down your load by .5 grain increments yet? Since you already have the powder might as well give it a chance.
chris
cty100 is offline  
Reply
Old 01-11-2009 | 12:35 PM
  #4  
bigcountry
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default RE: .260 Rem didn't perform well.

IMR4350 is a little slow for that round. Varget or IMR4064 is much more of an optimal powder for a 260. I have never loaded a 260 but have friends that do. I got lucky with sub 0.5MOA loads for a 7mm08 with IMR4350, but I don't think that is the case for everyone.
 
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 06:05 AM
  #5  
eldeguello's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,270
Likes: 0
From: Texas - BUT NOW in Madison County, NY
Default RE: .260 Rem didn't perform well.

I would work with 4350 a little more. It has generally given me good accuracy in quite a fewdifferent cartridges,from .243 up to 8mm. Sounds like 40 grains may be on the light side. But try workingup in half-grain increments and test for group size at each level......
eldeguello is offline  
Reply
Old 01-17-2009 | 11:55 AM
  #6  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,067
Likes: 0
From: Garfield NJ USA
Default RE: .260 Rem didn't perform well.

Sierra's 5'th has starting load of 35.9 max load of 40.8 for I4350.

Nosler's 5'th is 39.0 to 43.0

Lyman's 48'th is 37.5 to 41.5

Hornady's 6'th does not list I4350

I would start working up in 1/2 gr increments you should start to see some better groups around 41.5 to 42.5 gr and give a load density in the 85 -90 % range. 4350 usually does pretty well in the 308 based cases but like BC said I would also try some 4064 or maybe even some H4831 SC.

Personally I would rather stay with a flat base bullet in the 260, less of the bullet seating down into the powder charge.
thndrchiken is offline  
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
penninside08
Whitetail Deer Hunting
21
07-07-2009 05:32 AM
Smithbros.1
Black Powder
6
07-11-2005 08:37 PM
Huntsalotey
Reloading
3
09-05-2004 06:02 AM
Sling
Whitetail Deer Hunting
26
12-10-2003 07:16 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.