Reloading Questions for 300 WM
#31
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From:
The African Dik Dik.....
Scientific Name: Madoqua kirkii
Size: 14 to 16 inches at the shoulder
Weight: 10 to 12 pounds
Lifespan: 3 to 4 years, 10 years in captivity
Habitat: Dense forest to open plains
Diet: Herbivorous
Gestation: 6 months
Predators: Humans, many small carnivores
Poppin' one in the grassbag with a full house 7 mag 160 X at 55 yards ain't much more than splittin' a woodchuck in half....
You'd think at least a PH would know that and advise against it.........
Scientific Name: Madoqua kirkii
Size: 14 to 16 inches at the shoulder
Weight: 10 to 12 pounds
Lifespan: 3 to 4 years, 10 years in captivity
Habitat: Dense forest to open plains
Diet: Herbivorous
Gestation: 6 months
Predators: Humans, many small carnivores
Poppin' one in the grassbag with a full house 7 mag 160 X at 55 yards ain't much more than splittin' a woodchuck in half....
You'd think at least a PH would know that and advise against it.........
#32
Guest
Posts: n/a
ORIGINAL: SJAdventures
Why would an Africa PH who could give a crapone way or the otherBS aboutone particular bullet? He is just stating he isn't a fna of the Barnes triple shock because of the reason he gives and shows. I guarantee you the pictures are true whether y'all want to believe it or not. I could care less myself just posting information on a subject.
Why would an Africa PH who could give a crapone way or the otherBS aboutone particular bullet? He is just stating he isn't a fna of the Barnes triple shock because of the reason he gives and shows. I guarantee you the pictures are true whether y'all want to believe it or not. I could care less myself just posting information on a subject.
#33
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
From:
ORIGINAL: bigcountry
SJ, I sure am not saying your lying, but all I can tell you, is I have never experienced or seen anythinglike your PH is saying with the TSX 140gr out of a 7mm remmag. I mean if you experienced on thing but heard another, what would you think?
ORIGINAL: SJAdventures
Why would an Africa PH who could give a crapone way or the otherBS aboutone particular bullet? He is just stating he isn't a fna of the Barnes triple shock because of the reason he gives and shows. I guarantee you the pictures are true whether y'all want to believe it or not. I could care less myself just posting information on a subject.
Why would an Africa PH who could give a crapone way or the otherBS aboutone particular bullet? He is just stating he isn't a fna of the Barnes triple shock because of the reason he gives and shows. I guarantee you the pictures are true whether y'all want to believe it or not. I could care less myself just posting information on a subject.
"The African Dik Dik.....
Scientific Name: Madoqua kirkii
Size: 14 to 16 inches at the shoulder
Weight: 10 to 12 pounds
Lifespan: 3 to 4 years, 10 years in captivity
Habitat: Dense forest to open plains
Diet: Herbivorous
Gestation: 6 months
Predators: Humans, many small carnivores
Poppin' one in the grassbag with a full house 7 mag 160 X at 55 yards ain't much more than splittin' a woodchuck in half....
You'd think at least a PH would know that and advise against it......... "
As for your post Looney, I am not sure what the biology lesson was all about butthis PHalways advises his hunters all the timefor and against certain choices of calibers for certain species of game but hesays that so many bucket head wannabeballistic experts can't beadvised about anything because they already know everything and when they are paying $40,000+ for a safari they use what gun they want to regardless of what the PH thinks.
#34
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 499
Likes: 0
From:
Was actually supporting your photographic evidence of a Dikdik blown in half....sorry you missed that.
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what a high velocity 160 X is going to do to a 10 pound critter at 55 yards shot in the guts.............
I concure that there are a lot of experts out there who can't be told a thing and that be a key part of the problem regarding ballistics, and cape saving shot placement...I'd figure.
I can tell you one thing, a 168 TSX at 2860out of a 30-06 is a meat wrecker on northern whitetails, and thus I've gone to a smaller caliber as a result. Win/win, and the '06 is happy with just bear duty.......
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what a high velocity 160 X is going to do to a 10 pound critter at 55 yards shot in the guts.............
I concure that there are a lot of experts out there who can't be told a thing and that be a key part of the problem regarding ballistics, and cape saving shot placement...I'd figure.
I can tell you one thing, a 168 TSX at 2860out of a 30-06 is a meat wrecker on northern whitetails, and thus I've gone to a smaller caliber as a result. Win/win, and the '06 is happy with just bear duty.......
#35
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,837
Likes: 0
From:
ORIGINAL: Rifle Loony
Was actually supporting your photographic evidence of a Dikdik blown in half....sorry you missed that.
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what a high velocity 160 X is going to do to a 10 pound critter at 55 yards shot in the guts.............
I concure that there are a lot of experts out there who can't be told a thing and that be a key part of the problem regarding ballistics, and cape saving shot placement...I'd figure.
I can tell you one thing, a 168 TSX at 2860out of a 30-06 is a meat wrecker on northern whitetails, and thus I've gone to a smaller caliber as a result. Win/win, and the '06 is happy with just bear duty.......
Was actually supporting your photographic evidence of a Dikdik blown in half....sorry you missed that.
Doesn't take a rocket scientist to know what a high velocity 160 X is going to do to a 10 pound critter at 55 yards shot in the guts.............
I concure that there are a lot of experts out there who can't be told a thing and that be a key part of the problem regarding ballistics, and cape saving shot placement...I'd figure.
I can tell you one thing, a 168 TSX at 2860out of a 30-06 is a meat wrecker on northern whitetails, and thus I've gone to a smaller caliber as a result. Win/win, and the '06 is happy with just bear duty.......
#36
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,032
Likes: 0
From: Olive Branch MS USA
My own experience with the TSX on deer has been nothing like that. I've used the 140 in the 7mm mag and the 168 in a .300 Wby.In the 3 or 4 times I've used them I've gotten dime sized entrance holes and half dollar to dollar sized exits. These were all at relatively close range.
#37
If I have a 300lb B&C whitetail give me a crack at him this season, I would welcome that performance.
We've been using Barnes X bullets EXCLUSIVELY at our camp for the last 11 years. We started with the X, the XLC and are now all on the TSX. The rifles are .308 Win, .30-06, 7mm Mag, 300Win and 300Wby Mag. We must have downed 100 deerfrom 80lb doe to a nearly 300lb buck and bullet performance was flawless. All deer either dropped in their tracks or stumbled a few feet and fell.
A buddy shot a buck (maybe 170lbs) through both shoulders with his 300WM and a 150X bullet.ML was around 3300fps and the deer was about 40 yards broadside. The entrance hole was about caliber size and the exit about an inch and a half - at most. However, when we skinned it, we saw that it was pretty much pulverized. Both shoulders were comletely destroyed. The lungs were liquified. Did this deer die quickly? Yep
We've been using Barnes X bullets EXCLUSIVELY at our camp for the last 11 years. We started with the X, the XLC and are now all on the TSX. The rifles are .308 Win, .30-06, 7mm Mag, 300Win and 300Wby Mag. We must have downed 100 deerfrom 80lb doe to a nearly 300lb buck and bullet performance was flawless. All deer either dropped in their tracks or stumbled a few feet and fell.
A buddy shot a buck (maybe 170lbs) through both shoulders with his 300WM and a 150X bullet.ML was around 3300fps and the deer was about 40 yards broadside. The entrance hole was about caliber size and the exit about an inch and a half - at most. However, when we skinned it, we saw that it was pretty much pulverized. Both shoulders were comletely destroyed. The lungs were liquified. Did this deer die quickly? Yep

#39
Guest
Posts: n/a
ORIGINAL: SJAdventures
I personally always wanted to try them in my rifles but have heard horror stories about how bad they copper foul a barrel. Scirocco II's were bad enough for me.
I personally always wanted to try them in my rifles but have heard horror stories about how bad they copper foul a barrel. Scirocco II's were bad enough for me.


