To shoot thru or not
#31
RE: To shoot thru or not
ORIGINAL: frizzellr
As a side note I am curious as to what your idea of high velocity is. I use Nosler BT bullets out of a 270 Win and have shot several deer from 40 to 200 yards and have yet to have one "separate and go all through the meat". I understand there were more problems with BT in the early stages of their development, but I have yet to have one fail to exit.
That being said I like having two holes for a bloodtrail and I am sure most hunters here in the South will agree with me. No matter where you shoot a deer you cannot be 100% certain it is going to drop right in its tracks. In some of the thickets around here you can lose a deer within 40 yards if you don't have a bloodtrail. Maybe bloodtrails are not as important in wide open country, I don't know.
The nosler ballistic tip is a pretty poor bullet for deer if you shoot them at 50 yds at high velocity, most will separate and go all through the meat.
That being said I like having two holes for a bloodtrail and I am sure most hunters here in the South will agree with me. No matter where you shoot a deer you cannot be 100% certain it is going to drop right in its tracks. In some of the thickets around here you can lose a deer within 40 yards if you don't have a bloodtrail. Maybe bloodtrails are not as important in wide open country, I don't know.
The Ballistic Tip is usually wonderfully accurate, but it has not shown me to be a bullet that holds together very well.
For that reason, I preferNosler Partitions.
#32
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location:
Posts: 10
RE: To shoot thru or not
I shoot a Winchester 88 284 the load is IMR4350 The bullet is a cheap speer 145 gr spizter I aim where the heart is surpose to be , the bullet clips the heart the deer runs at the most 100 yards most of the time the bullet passes through or hangs up on the hide on the other side , most of the ruined meat is on the ribs havent lost a deer yet you can tell if its a heart shot by the way they hump up , if you shoot a deer with a 22 cal and it hits the heart the deer is dead period maybe not right there but if your pump has a hole in it it will pump till its dry .the trick is to study the animal and find where the heart is .thats my to pesos worth
#33
Member
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Asheboro NC
Posts: 56
RE: To shoot thru or not
ORIGINAL: Dixie Rebel
The perfect bullet will do this;
[ol][*]Accurately reach the deer[*]Penetrate[*]Expand,causing massive damage inside[*]Hold the bullet jacket and core together[*]Maintain bullet integrity/weight as much as possible[*]Exit the deer!!!!!!!!!![*]Yes, exit woundsARE a desireablebenefit![/ol]
I like Nosler Partitions!
For the record...I'm totally against head shots; they ARE NOT a hit or miss proposition as many would have you believe.
Behind the Shoulder andHigh Shoulder shots are fine...but not head shots.
The perfect bullet will do this;
[ol][*]Accurately reach the deer[*]Penetrate[*]Expand,causing massive damage inside[*]Hold the bullet jacket and core together[*]Maintain bullet integrity/weight as much as possible[*]Exit the deer!!!!!!!!!![*]Yes, exit woundsARE a desireablebenefit![/ol]
I like Nosler Partitions!
For the record...I'm totally against head shots; they ARE NOT a hit or miss proposition as many would have you believe.
Behind the Shoulder andHigh Shoulder shots are fine...but not head shots.
I am confused by this: Your #5 hopes for full weight retention while your favorite bullet sheds over 40% of it's weight at high velocities?
Don't get me wrong, the partition is a GREAT bullet. But, it can't hold a candle to solid copper or true bonded bullets (trophy bond/bearclaw) in terms of weight retention. I'da guessed Barnes to be your favorite(?).
However, I think the partition (& bullets that behave is such manner) are the best of both worlds. If a bullet sheds "some"; your #3 has just increased. You have a larger wound channel (ever shot something with birdshot up close) and then you still get ENOUGH penetration (deer are not bulletproof, nor built like cape buffalo).
Don't get me wrong. Everyone needs a bullet to make it to the deer & into the vitals. My experience has observed that larger wound channels=dead deer faster. As stated, here in the Southeast is a BIG advantage. Still a 100% retention bullet will kill just as dead... Just not as quick for me... YMMV, just don't believe everything the bullet manf's tell you (It's called advertising)
And for the record: I am not either a fan of a headshot from some ya-hoo that didn't check his rifle since last year. But, I put hours at the bench & shooting each week. I wouldn't think of carrying a rifle to the woods I couldn't hit a golfball with (CONSISTANTLY) at 100yrds. A short whistle will put any 50yrddeer in the woods into statue mode. Were is the problem? 2+2=4.....
#34
RE: To shoot thru or not
ORIGINAL: Coleridge
I am confused by this: Your #5 hopes for full weight retention while your favorite bullet sheds over 40% of it's weight at high velocities?
Don't get me wrong, the partition is a GREAT bullet. But, it can't hold a candle to solid copper or true bonded bullets (trophy bond/bearclaw) in terms of weight retention. I'da guessed Barnes to be your favorite(?).
However, I think the partition (& bullets that behave is such manner) are the best of both worlds. If a bullet sheds "some"; your #3 has just increased. You have a larger wound channel (ever shot something with birdshot up close) and then you still get ENOUGH penetration (deer are not bulletproof, nor built like cape buffalo).
Don't get me wrong. Everyone needs a bullet to make it to the deer & into the vitals. My experience has observed that larger wound channels=dead deer faster. As stated, here in the Southeast is a BIG advantage. Still a 100% retention bullet will kill just as dead... Just not as quick for me... YMMV, just don't believe everything the bullet manf's tell you (It's called advertising)
And for the record: I am not either a fan of a headshot from some ya-hoo that didn't check his rifle since last year. But, I put hours at the bench & shooting each week. I wouldn't think of carrying a rifle to the woods I couldn't hit a golfball with (CONSISTANTLY) at 100yrds. A short whistle will put any 50yrddeer in the woods into statue mode. Were is the problem? 2+2=4.....
ORIGINAL: Dixie Rebel
The perfect bullet will do this;
[ol][*]Accurately reach the deer[*]Penetrate[*]Expand,causing massive damage inside[*]Hold the bullet jacket and core together[*]Maintain bullet integrity/weight as much as possible[*]Exit the deer!!!!!!!!!![*]Yes, exit woundsARE a desireablebenefit![/ol]
I like Nosler Partitions!
For the record...I'm totally against head shots; they ARE NOT a hit or miss proposition as many would have you believe.
Behind the Shoulder andHigh Shoulder shots are fine...but not head shots.
The perfect bullet will do this;
[ol][*]Accurately reach the deer[*]Penetrate[*]Expand,causing massive damage inside[*]Hold the bullet jacket and core together[*]Maintain bullet integrity/weight as much as possible[*]Exit the deer!!!!!!!!!![*]Yes, exit woundsARE a desireablebenefit![/ol]
I like Nosler Partitions!
For the record...I'm totally against head shots; they ARE NOT a hit or miss proposition as many would have you believe.
Behind the Shoulder andHigh Shoulder shots are fine...but not head shots.
I am confused by this: Your #5 hopes for full weight retention while your favorite bullet sheds over 40% of it's weight at high velocities?
Don't get me wrong, the partition is a GREAT bullet. But, it can't hold a candle to solid copper or true bonded bullets (trophy bond/bearclaw) in terms of weight retention. I'da guessed Barnes to be your favorite(?).
However, I think the partition (& bullets that behave is such manner) are the best of both worlds. If a bullet sheds "some"; your #3 has just increased. You have a larger wound channel (ever shot something with birdshot up close) and then you still get ENOUGH penetration (deer are not bulletproof, nor built like cape buffalo).
Don't get me wrong. Everyone needs a bullet to make it to the deer & into the vitals. My experience has observed that larger wound channels=dead deer faster. As stated, here in the Southeast is a BIG advantage. Still a 100% retention bullet will kill just as dead... Just not as quick for me... YMMV, just don't believe everything the bullet manf's tell you (It's called advertising)
And for the record: I am not either a fan of a headshot from some ya-hoo that didn't check his rifle since last year. But, I put hours at the bench & shooting each week. I wouldn't think of carrying a rifle to the woods I couldn't hit a golfball with (CONSISTANTLY) at 100yrds. A short whistle will put any 50yrddeer in the woods into statue mode. Were is the problem? 2+2=4.....
The Barnes X Bullet has a poor reputation for expanding, however, the Triple Shocks seem to have a much better track record for expanding and reports are theyperform on par with the Nosler Partition. I haven't had the opportunity to try the Triple Shocks.
#37
Giant Nontypical
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,425
RE: To shoot thru or not
I have related this before, so please bear with me...I have used the same .243 since 1980..For about 15 years and probably 75 deer or so all I used were 100gr CoreLokts...Didn't have any problems but wanted to try different factory loadings...I tried Remington Premier 100gr SPBT (discontinued), Federal Premium 100gr Sierra SPBT, Federal Premium 100gr Nosler Partition, Federal Premium 85gr Sierra HPBT and Federal Classic 100gr (I think they call it their HotCore), Winchester Supreme 100gr PowerPoint, Winchester White Box Powerpoint, Hornady Custom 100gr InterLokt and the Nitrex 100gr GrandSlam...
I would shoot 5-6 deer with each and sometimes take a high shoulder and sometimes a broadside center lung shot...I never lost a deer so they all "worked"...Sometimes I had an exit, sometimes not...The bullets that were less likely to exit dropped deer closer to where they were standing when hit with a center lung shot...Each deer hit with a high shoulder shot dropped on the spot....
They all worked but the internal damage was more with the "softer" bullets...As a general rule deer shot with a "softer" bullet, through the lungs would run less than 75 yards and many fell from 25-50 yards from the shot, no blood trail but blood at the sight of the hit....Frankly if a deer goes less than 75 yards I will find them and if I have to drop the deer right there I can put it through the shoulder blades....
Now this is what I want a bullet to do....Exit on a center lung shot, especially if the deer is farther than 50-75 yards away, face it when closer the bullet opens up rapidly and you will have that bullet stay in the deer more than one that is 150-200 yards away...Now on high shoulder shots, I could care less if I have an exit, because the deer will drop right there...
You can have too hard a bullet...I had 3 deer in these tests that ran 125 yards or so...All were hit with the Remington Premier 100gr SPBT...These are the hardest bullets I ever shot in a .243, on lung shot deer the exit was smaller than a quarter...I had a decent blood trail, but they taught me that a bullet can be too hard...They would always exit, even on high shoulder shots....
Deer are remarkable animals, easy to kill if hit properly and can go a long ways if not...Several years ago my brother and I were hunting together, on the ground beside a winter wheat field...Several does came out, we both picked one out, he counted to 3 and we both shot....Ended up shooting the same doe...Him with a .270, me with a .243..Both using Sierra GameKings, both had an exit, he hit 3-4 inches behind the shoulder, I hit on the opposite side when she spun around, just behind the shoulder....That dang doe ran about 60 yards or so and fell 15 yards in the woods....She couldn't have weighed more than 100 pounds, yet she took two good hits....That deer made me realize that a bigger hole through the lungs does not always mean they will drop quicker....Both shots were killing shots, she just held her breath and left the field....
I would shoot 5-6 deer with each and sometimes take a high shoulder and sometimes a broadside center lung shot...I never lost a deer so they all "worked"...Sometimes I had an exit, sometimes not...The bullets that were less likely to exit dropped deer closer to where they were standing when hit with a center lung shot...Each deer hit with a high shoulder shot dropped on the spot....
They all worked but the internal damage was more with the "softer" bullets...As a general rule deer shot with a "softer" bullet, through the lungs would run less than 75 yards and many fell from 25-50 yards from the shot, no blood trail but blood at the sight of the hit....Frankly if a deer goes less than 75 yards I will find them and if I have to drop the deer right there I can put it through the shoulder blades....
Now this is what I want a bullet to do....Exit on a center lung shot, especially if the deer is farther than 50-75 yards away, face it when closer the bullet opens up rapidly and you will have that bullet stay in the deer more than one that is 150-200 yards away...Now on high shoulder shots, I could care less if I have an exit, because the deer will drop right there...
You can have too hard a bullet...I had 3 deer in these tests that ran 125 yards or so...All were hit with the Remington Premier 100gr SPBT...These are the hardest bullets I ever shot in a .243, on lung shot deer the exit was smaller than a quarter...I had a decent blood trail, but they taught me that a bullet can be too hard...They would always exit, even on high shoulder shots....
Deer are remarkable animals, easy to kill if hit properly and can go a long ways if not...Several years ago my brother and I were hunting together, on the ground beside a winter wheat field...Several does came out, we both picked one out, he counted to 3 and we both shot....Ended up shooting the same doe...Him with a .270, me with a .243..Both using Sierra GameKings, both had an exit, he hit 3-4 inches behind the shoulder, I hit on the opposite side when she spun around, just behind the shoulder....That dang doe ran about 60 yards or so and fell 15 yards in the woods....She couldn't have weighed more than 100 pounds, yet she took two good hits....That deer made me realize that a bigger hole through the lungs does not always mean they will drop quicker....Both shots were killing shots, she just held her breath and left the field....
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
sngehl01
Technical
15
03-04-2008 07:15 AM
LadyRobinHood
Official IBO.Net Forum - 3-D Shooting
3
07-04-2006 04:13 PM