Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
#1
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location:
Posts: 68
Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
So there I was, comparing the Winchester Ballistic Silvertips and Accubonds, both in 180 Grain. Couldn't find much of a difference besides slight (very slight) differences in ballsitics/weight retention etc. Other than the different colored tips they seem virtually identical. How will these 2 bullets compare up in the field?? (300 WSM)
#2
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location:
Posts: 1,785
RE: Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
In the sales literature, ballistic tips are define by rapid expansion, and the accubonds are defined as controlled expansion. From my experience with 150 grs and over, it doesn't make much difference. I have personally had bad experiences with 130 gr ballistic tips in 270, but 140 gr accubonds have performed flawlessly. With 180 gr, I would not worry with either.
#3
RE: Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
aucontraire BG they are different in construction and design. Main difference the Ab is bonded and BT is not. The BT has a design upper ceiling limit of which Nolsersays3000fps at impact(many feel this is optimistic and should be a few 100 fps slower). The Ab has no upper velocity ceiling attached to it. The ABis design to retain 60% of its mass. Just like the nolser partiton front 1/3 is designis shed to create a larger wound channel (=more trauma) and the remaining portion is their to pentrate deep (thru bone, muscle and tissue). The BT is not really design to hold onto mass persay, in fact i have never recovered one intact (most have blown through but the few that didn't pieces were all that was left -hence the RAPID expansion design/class given to the BT bullets).
Both bullets are really built for longer range, IMO their is no need for either if you don't expect to shoot 200 or further with regularity (much better to go with a flat based bullet like the Nosler Partition, Barnes TSX, etc).
AB deer and uplargerorneed pentration/retention gaurantees. BT for deer sized and understand that if you hit the shoulder at rate of speed expect some losses (bullet pentration, retention and meat)!
I like em both but migrate back to the NBT, just flat out works for my situation is cheap toreload and deadly accurate in my rifles.
Both bullets are really built for longer range, IMO their is no need for either if you don't expect to shoot 200 or further with regularity (much better to go with a flat based bullet like the Nosler Partition, Barnes TSX, etc).
AB deer and uplargerorneed pentration/retention gaurantees. BT for deer sized and understand that if you hit the shoulder at rate of speed expect some losses (bullet pentration, retention and meat)!
I like em both but migrate back to the NBT, just flat out works for my situation is cheap toreload and deadly accurate in my rifles.
#4
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 309
RE: Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
With you Skeeter on the NBT-- Accurate as hell and has never let me down on any animal including moose withthe 225grain Whelen in my .35 Whelen.
NBT's are my go to round when sighting in for groups and checking the accuracy of a new rifle.
NBT's are my go to round when sighting in for groups and checking the accuracy of a new rifle.
#5
Fork Horn
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Idaho's Elk Country
Posts: 275
RE: Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
Skeeter- The Accubond does have a 3100fps ceiling per their web site.I have found 30cal 150gr NBT's to beway tooexplosive on game(mulies) out of my 30-06. They've just let me down too many times.I've had 5"-6" shallow wounds on a few deer. I now shoot Accubonds in my 30-06, 25-06, and my 7RMbecouse they flat penetrate. In a larger cal.the NBT'smight be much better, but I'll never use them againexcept for varmints. Brett
#6
Spike
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Vandenberg AFB, CA United States
Posts: 13
RE: Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
I just switched to AccuBond last week because Nosler discontinued the bullet I was using. Three of my hunting friends use the AB for deer and pig and strongly recommended it to me. So far I’m very impressed with this bullet. It’s very accurate in my rifle and dropped my pig in his tracks last Friday, although I did shoot him between the eyes; a 22 LR can do that at close range but I wouldn't recommend it.
#7
RE: Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
ORIGINAL: thegamehunter
So there I was, comparing the Winchester Ballistic Silvertips and Accubonds, both in 180 Grain. Couldn't find much of a difference besides slight (very slight) differences in ballsitics/weight retention etc. Other than the different colored tips they seem virtually identical. How will these 2 bullets compare up in the field?? (300 WSM)
So there I was, comparing the Winchester Ballistic Silvertips and Accubonds, both in 180 Grain. Couldn't find much of a difference besides slight (very slight) differences in ballsitics/weight retention etc. Other than the different colored tips they seem virtually identical. How will these 2 bullets compare up in the field?? (300 WSM)
For deer-szed game, the BT should suffice. If you are going for elk or moose, though, use an Accubond.....
#8
RE: Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
Shoot whichever shoots best out of your gun for deer sized critters, they will never know what hit 'em. If you move up to anything bigger than mule deer I'd go with the AccuBonds.
#10
RE: Ballistic Tip vs. Accubond
The ballistic silvertip is a BT with a moly-type coating (I think they call it a ducolax coating or something), and a silver tip. With that coating you can expect to gain 50fps over a standard BT under ideal situations.