Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Outdoor Gear > Optics
 Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ? >

Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

Community
Optics Quality optics are a must-have for any serious hunter. Discuss them here.

Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-12-2008, 10:54 PM
  #1  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

Anyone have any experience with the nikon monarch line? not the monarch gold.... Is the Monarch Gold or Monarch Xmuch nicer than the Monarch?

Or the Nikon BDC reticle? like the circles? I have a leupold with the B&C and like it, just not crazy about those magnifications.....

I'm considering a Nikon Monarch 3-12x42 sf with the BDC reticle

Also considering a Leupold vx-iii 3.5-10x40 with the B&C reticle
as well as the 4.5-14x40 with the B&C reticle

Really think the 3-12x range is ideal, though its a good amount cheaper than the leupold, I'd rather spend more on quality then to save a few bucks at the cost of quality...
salukipv1 is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 12:02 AM
  #2  
Giant Nontypical
 
skeeter 7MM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 6,921
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

I have a new monarch 2.5x10x42 with NP reticle, optically it doesn't give up much if anything to the VXIII's (have as well).IMO styling sucks on the monarch, power ring on mine is stiff and eye positioning is more critical with the Monarch vs the VXIII. As far as the BDC I hate it personally, the circles are large and distracting to me. I prefer the Leupold BP of the 2.

BUTI suggest you take a boo/consider the Zeiss Conquest with Rapid Z reticle. IMO better then both of the above optically &features.. I have been playing with my newest Conquestthat has theRapid Z600 reticle, its nice and clean...I like! This is my 4th Conquest and nothing but good experiences.
skeeter 7MM is offline  
Old 04-13-2008, 07:55 AM
  #3  
Nontypical Buck
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Clermont Florida U.S.
Posts: 4,970
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

I'd second the Conquest with the Rapid Z 600. I prefer it over the Z 800. I like Leuppy's with the B&C reticle, and very much dislike the Nikon BDC reticle. Another possibility would be the new Sightron Big Sky's with the HHR reticle. It's just enough without being cluttered.
bugsNbows is offline  
Old 04-14-2008, 03:04 PM
  #4  
Giant Nontypical
Thread Starter
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

its going on a .243.......so it looks like the zeiss Z600 fits the .243, yet they dont make the 4.5-14x44 in a z600, only a z800, which seems to be more for.300RUM or .338 rum rounds....


salukipv1 is offline  
Old 05-06-2008, 10:03 PM
  #5  
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

The Nikon Monarch in my opinion are perfect hunting binoculars. They are designed to handle all sorts of terrain and the feature I like about them most, is their anti-reflective properties. This means the sun does not interfere with your binoculars.
bizcorp is offline  
Old 05-08-2008, 08:35 AM
  #6  
Giant Nontypical
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location:
Posts: 6,471
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

Nikon Monarch = Leupold VX-III but the VX-III has the better reticle. That BDC reticle is annoying at best. Yes the Monarch Gold has 30mm glass same as used in the Monarch as does the X. All The Monarchs have the same glass.
oldelkhunter is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 07:21 PM
  #7  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

ORIGINAL: bizcorp

The Nikon Monarch in my opinion are perfect hunting binoculars. They are designed to handle all sorts of terrain and the feature I like about them most, is their anti-reflective properties. This means the sun does not interfere with your binoculars.
get a 50mm if you can it will let more light in low light conditions to where you can see earlier and later,i have a 3.5x10x50 conqeust and it is some good glass
bucksnortinted is offline  
Old 05-20-2008, 07:24 PM
  #8  
Fork Horn
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Muskegon,Michigan
Posts: 407
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

i am sorry once again this quote was meant for salukipv1,sorry........Ted
bucksnortinted is offline  
Old 05-21-2008, 02:30 AM
  #9  
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location:
Posts: 30
Default RE: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?

Put a leupold on it.
MObuckhunter is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
robbcayman
Optics
17
08-29-2008 01:14 AM
salukipv1
Guns
23
04-16-2008 04:19 PM
Kirch
Optics
11
10-29-2007 07:32 AM
losthwy
Bowhunting
3
07-22-2007 03:24 PM
BOWHUNTERCOP
Firearm Review Forum
13
12-25-2004 02:47 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Quick Reply: Nikon Monarch vs. Leupold VX-III ?


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.