which rings?
02-07-2007 | 08:47 AM
#1
Thread Starter
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
which rings?
ring shopping is more confusing than scope shopping. low, med, high?? rifle is a stevens 200 model in .308 cal. no bases currently attached to gun. scope will be one of these: Nikon ProStaff, Nikon Buckmaster, Burris FullField II or Bushnell Elite 3200 (all in 3-9x40). looking for recommendations for bases and rings please. anybody have any love or hatred for specific brands or types? thanks
02-07-2007 | 10:40 AM
#2
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
From:
RE: which rings?
There are a couple of basic styles of scope mounts, and several manufacurers make them.
Probably the most common around here is the "Leupold" style. The base has a fixed front dovetail, that the ring twists into, and a rear windage adjustable ring mount, with a mounting screw on each side. Leupold, Nikon, Burris, Millet, and probably a few others make this style. They are always made of steel, and can be had in a 1-pc or 2-pc base. A 2-pc base will save you some weight and give you more clearance to the loading port on your bolt action. Others claim the 1-pc base adds rigidity to the action. I have drifted away from using this style in recent years. Sometimes the rings can be a pain to line up, and I've had the windage screws come loose on me during a hunt.
The other popular style is the "Weaver" style. Many companies make Weaver style bases and rings, and they can be had in aluminum or steel, if weight is a concern. There are some quick release style rings that return to zero when you remove and replace the scope. This is a nice feature, if you plan to have iron sights as a back up to your scope. I have Warne Maxima bases and Quick Release rings on my .375 H&H. They work well, and as advertised, they do return to zero.
My favorite scope mounts are the Talley Lightweights. They are a mounting system where the base and ring are one integral unit. The rings line up perfectly everytime, and they are lightweight and easy to install. I have recently changed most of my "Leupold" style mounts over to the Talleys. No more loose windage screws for me.
Personally, I would avoid the over/under mounts (the ones where you can use your iron sights or a scope). They are not very sturdy and picking your head up to look through the scope of a high-powered rifle is just asking for trouble.
No matter which option you decide to go with, I recommend mounting your scope as low as possible. Most scopes, with a 40mm or smaller objective, can be mounted in "low" rings without issue.
Good luck!
Probably the most common around here is the "Leupold" style. The base has a fixed front dovetail, that the ring twists into, and a rear windage adjustable ring mount, with a mounting screw on each side. Leupold, Nikon, Burris, Millet, and probably a few others make this style. They are always made of steel, and can be had in a 1-pc or 2-pc base. A 2-pc base will save you some weight and give you more clearance to the loading port on your bolt action. Others claim the 1-pc base adds rigidity to the action. I have drifted away from using this style in recent years. Sometimes the rings can be a pain to line up, and I've had the windage screws come loose on me during a hunt.
The other popular style is the "Weaver" style. Many companies make Weaver style bases and rings, and they can be had in aluminum or steel, if weight is a concern. There are some quick release style rings that return to zero when you remove and replace the scope. This is a nice feature, if you plan to have iron sights as a back up to your scope. I have Warne Maxima bases and Quick Release rings on my .375 H&H. They work well, and as advertised, they do return to zero.
My favorite scope mounts are the Talley Lightweights. They are a mounting system where the base and ring are one integral unit. The rings line up perfectly everytime, and they are lightweight and easy to install. I have recently changed most of my "Leupold" style mounts over to the Talleys. No more loose windage screws for me.
Personally, I would avoid the over/under mounts (the ones where you can use your iron sights or a scope). They are not very sturdy and picking your head up to look through the scope of a high-powered rifle is just asking for trouble.
No matter which option you decide to go with, I recommend mounting your scope as low as possible. Most scopes, with a 40mm or smaller objective, can be mounted in "low" rings without issue.
Good luck!
02-07-2007 | 01:53 PM
#3
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 6,921
Likes: 0
From: Saskatchewan Canada
RE: which rings?
Leupold Double Dovetails eliminate the worry of loosening windage screws. They are bit tougher install, if you go this route use a 1" piece of dowel or pipe to twist in the dovetails not YOUR SCOPE! This is my favorite fixed mount, Iprefer 2 piece on bolts.
For detatchable or weaver style I like the Warne Maxima's as well.
Low rings should work withmost 40mm objective scopes.
For detatchable or weaver style I like the Warne Maxima's as well.
Low rings should work withmost 40mm objective scopes.
