HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Optics (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/optics-85/)
-   -   which rings? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/optics/179439-rings.html)

scooterpop 02-07-2007 08:47 AM

which rings?
 
ring shopping is more confusing than scope shopping. low, med, high?? rifle is a stevens 200 model in .308 cal. no bases currently attached to gun. scope will be one of these: Nikon ProStaff, Nikon Buckmaster, Burris FullField II or Bushnell Elite 3200 (all in 3-9x40). looking for recommendations for bases and rings please. anybody have any love or hatred for specific brands or types? thanks

Dan in Alaska 02-07-2007 10:40 AM

RE: which rings?
 
There are a couple of basic styles of scope mounts, and several manufacurers make them.

Probably the most common around here is the "Leupold" style. The base has a fixed front dovetail, that the ring twists into, and a rear windage adjustable ring mount, with a mounting screw on each side. Leupold, Nikon, Burris, Millet, and probably a few others make this style. They are always made of steel, and can be had in a 1-pc or 2-pc base. A 2-pc base will save you some weight and give you more clearance to the loading port on your bolt action. Others claim the 1-pc base adds rigidity to the action. I have drifted away from using this style in recent years. Sometimes the rings can be a pain to line up, and I've had the windage screws come loose on me during a hunt.

The other popular style is the "Weaver" style. Many companies make Weaver style bases and rings, and they can be had in aluminum or steel, if weight is a concern. There are some quick release style rings that return to zero when you remove and replace the scope. This is a nice feature, if you plan to have iron sights as a back up to your scope. I have Warne Maxima bases and Quick Release rings on my .375 H&H. They work well, and as advertised, they do return to zero.

My favorite scope mounts are the Talley Lightweights. They are a mounting system where the base and ring are one integral unit. The rings line up perfectly everytime, and they are lightweight and easy to install. I have recently changed most of my "Leupold" style mounts over to the Talleys. No more loose windage screws for me. :D

Personally, I would avoid the over/under mounts (the ones where you can use your iron sights or a scope). They are not very sturdy and picking your head up to look through the scope of a high-powered rifle is just asking for trouble.

No matter which option you decide to go with, I recommend mounting your scope as low as possible. Most scopes, with a 40mm or smaller objective, can be mounted in "low" rings without issue.

Good luck!

skeeter 7MM 02-07-2007 01:53 PM

RE: which rings?
 
Leupold Double Dovetails eliminate the worry of loosening windage screws. They are bit tougher install, if you go this route use a 1" piece of dowel or pipe to twist in the dovetails not YOUR SCOPE! This is my favorite fixed mount, Iprefer 2 piece on bolts.

For detatchable or weaver style I like the Warne Maxima's as well.

Low rings should work withmost 40mm objective scopes.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:04 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.