DEC has it figured out!!
#82
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Delhi, NY (by way of Chenango Forks)
Posts: 1,706
RE: DEC has it figured out!!
like i said originally alloutdoors, should have stopped when the stopping was possible.
I know it's hard to but sometimes you just got to walk away.
We are always going to have differences of opinion - most of the time we can have decent conversations/discussions on these interesting topice, but this one has digresses too far and the same dead horse is being beaten.
All I know is that I am glad I am ALWAYS right!!!!!
I think I will follow my original advice and STOP.
I know it's hard to but sometimes you just got to walk away.
We are always going to have differences of opinion - most of the time we can have decent conversations/discussions on these interesting topice, but this one has digresses too far and the same dead horse is being beaten.
All I know is that I am glad I am ALWAYS right!!!!!
I think I will follow my original advice and STOP.
#84
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: DEC has it figured out!!
ORIGINAL: doughboysigep
They could institute a statewode QDM program if they felt that is what the public wanted, but trust me, the public doesn't (look at the antler restriction issue in PA and multiply that by 10 for QDM regs)
They could institute a statewode QDM program if they felt that is what the public wanted, but trust me, the public doesn't (look at the antler restriction issue in PA and multiply that by 10 for QDM regs)
Is that so hard to understand??
#85
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Delhi, NY (by way of Chenango Forks)
Posts: 1,706
RE: DEC has it figured out!!
damn, cant do it (stop that is)
not bad ideas, however - you know how many people complian about license fees and the costs of hunting?? (a lot) - do u thiunk those people will "waste" $.37 on mailing the unused tags?? (maybe self addressed stamped envelope?)
and
how in the world are you going to monitor those calling and those not calling although I like the idea of doe tag penalties or even doe tag rewards (preferences) for those complying with these hypothetcal regs
How about having to mail in all unused tags at the end of the year. Check the number of used tags vs the number of ones called in and you will see who didn't call in their kills. Inact penalties for not calling in kills like no doe permits next year and you will see the phones ring off the wall.
and
how in the world are you going to monitor those calling and those not calling although I like the idea of doe tag penalties or even doe tag rewards (preferences) for those complying with these hypothetcal regs
#86
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Rochester New York USA
Posts: 142
RE: DEC has it figured out!!
Atlasman- As I continue to read all your posts it is blatantly apparent that you are in fact a spin doctor. Again, you prove my point and show that there is not room for accountability in your world. You continuously blame others for your lack of understanding in these matters and blatant disregard for founded knowledge. In your world everything is obviously black and white. To twist words in the fashion you have is wonderful. Have you ever considered a career in used cars? I have had far more success getting walls to think about things. Instead of considering the possibilities and what you can do to help the situation you come on a public forum cry, whine and point fingers. My suggestion to you is to stop hunting if you are so dissatisfied. Apparently, you are unwilling to take matters further on your own and refuse to understand any additional concepts. There is much to be said about those who require instant of self gratification above all else. Just because the DEC is not living up to your standards does by no means they have failed in the management. You are better off not wasting your money on a license and taking up golf.
I find it ironic how you use my example of co-ops to prove your own point where its people like you that make them necessary. Co-ops and QDM lands have been formed so that hunters can choose their own destiny not because the DEC was doing a poor job but because hunters were slobs and not doing theirs either in harvest or voicing their opinions. We are forced to manage the hunters more often than the game and this can only be accomplished through pushing the bad apples out. People like you are the reason why we have to spend tens of thousands of dollars each year to lease and buy land so we can have a group that understands the process and deer biology as a whole. Like I said before, DEC can’t do everything for you, just the same as any other governing party. You just seem to be too short sighted to realize that. I have a justifiable answer to every single one of your questions however, I choose not to waste my time answering as your mind is already made up and there is no room for additional thought on these matters. Obviously, we could go back and fourth like this til we are both blue in the face. However, the difference between you and I is I look at your subject matter objectively and with an open mind where you only go on the defensive, point fingers and state how everyone else is wrong. Like others have said, if you have a better system let someone know about it. Otherwise, please do not burden us with your lack of knowledge and mind boggling posts any longer. You have yet to provide one specific point that is not based on someone else’s posts.
Good luck to you this fall. I offer you this; if you would like to, I would be happy to share my knowledge with you regarding these matters. I am even willing to invite you to my land despite your crass towards me and my associates to see how we do what we do to manage our habitat, hunters and game. I can even get you face time with DEC official to explain your feelings if you would like. That is a sincere offer and I truly mean it. I believe that sometimes the only way to get people to see eye to eye is to look into their eyes and talk face to face. My offer stands, but I am sure you will negate it in some way. TGK
I find it ironic how you use my example of co-ops to prove your own point where its people like you that make them necessary. Co-ops and QDM lands have been formed so that hunters can choose their own destiny not because the DEC was doing a poor job but because hunters were slobs and not doing theirs either in harvest or voicing their opinions. We are forced to manage the hunters more often than the game and this can only be accomplished through pushing the bad apples out. People like you are the reason why we have to spend tens of thousands of dollars each year to lease and buy land so we can have a group that understands the process and deer biology as a whole. Like I said before, DEC can’t do everything for you, just the same as any other governing party. You just seem to be too short sighted to realize that. I have a justifiable answer to every single one of your questions however, I choose not to waste my time answering as your mind is already made up and there is no room for additional thought on these matters. Obviously, we could go back and fourth like this til we are both blue in the face. However, the difference between you and I is I look at your subject matter objectively and with an open mind where you only go on the defensive, point fingers and state how everyone else is wrong. Like others have said, if you have a better system let someone know about it. Otherwise, please do not burden us with your lack of knowledge and mind boggling posts any longer. You have yet to provide one specific point that is not based on someone else’s posts.
Good luck to you this fall. I offer you this; if you would like to, I would be happy to share my knowledge with you regarding these matters. I am even willing to invite you to my land despite your crass towards me and my associates to see how we do what we do to manage our habitat, hunters and game. I can even get you face time with DEC official to explain your feelings if you would like. That is a sincere offer and I truly mean it. I believe that sometimes the only way to get people to see eye to eye is to look into their eyes and talk face to face. My offer stands, but I am sure you will negate it in some way. TGK
#87
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: DEC has it figured out!!
ORIGINAL: NY Bowhunter
works for me atlas. Hey do you have a biology degree? How did you come up with that you lonely tree climber.
works for me atlas. Hey do you have a biology degree? How did you come up with that you lonely tree climber.
Yes........but sadly it's in human biology........I feel so dumb
#89
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 4,668
RE: DEC has it figured out!!
ORIGINAL: doughboysigep
not bad ideas
not bad ideas
however - you know how many people complian about license fees and the costs of hunting?? (a lot) - do u thiunk those people will "waste" $.37 on mailing the unused tags?? (maybe self addressed stamped envelope?)
how in the world are you going to monitor those calling and those not calling
although I like the idea of doe tag penalties or even doe tag rewards (preferences) for those complying with these hypothetcal regs
People will seldom do something if they have nothing to gain or lose personally......that is why the DECALS system is so ripe for abuse.
#90
Boone & Crockett
Thread Starter
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location:
Posts: 11,472
RE: DEC has it figured out!!
- do u thiunk those people will "waste" $.37 on mailing the unused tags??
how in the world are you going to monitor those calling and those not calling
tag #21 (Joe Blow) was issued 5 doe tags
tag #21 (Joe Blow)has called in 2 deer
tag #21 (Joe Blow) had better mail in 3 unused tags or Joe doesn't receive any the next season. A letter with a deadline as a reminder maybe? Take all the mailed in unused tags and all the called in deer mix in some percentage errors either way and arrive at what I think could be a more accurate assesment.