Community
Northeast ME, NH, VT, NY, CT, RI, MA, PA, DE, WV, MD, NJ Remember, the Regional forums are for hunting topics only.

Pa game commission hunting license fee increase not needed

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-25-2010 | 07:00 AM
  #21  
Nontypical Buck
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Default

irst, The PGC has a constitutional mandate to manage for all of PA's wildlife.
When did they revise the PA constitution to include a mandate for the PGC to manage for all wildlife?
bluebird2 is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-2010 | 07:10 AM
  #22  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Default

I knew about newts I was making a point...if the PGC was run correctly; by management the MAJORITY of hunters elect onto the BOC ,maybe just maybe all the ecoweenie programs and old growth forests that Roe loves so dearly would get the attention they deserve. case/point at a time when deer management should be first in the minds of anyone remotely attached to the BOC we're fretting over brown bats...OH bats are cute in their mother's eye and do have their niche BUT everything in it's rank. Don't spout off about Bat programs and such an ask for the public's imput to detract from the deer problems when you don't have any interest in listening to what the majority of your funding base has to say about it...much like CAC
Potterco is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-2010 | 07:13 AM
  #23  
Screamin Steel's Avatar
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Originally Posted by Cornelius08
Also dont forget pgc already also has around 40 million still left in the reserve fund. They have been breaking close to even so that 40 mil. could last quite a while only being dipped into for a mil or two a year.

All that $ in reserve yet we lack any data on the results of AR, and WMI said available herd health data was insufficient to date. ??????? Why won't they ante up and pay for more research, esp if they think it would vindicate their management goals? Are they afraid it wouldn't? If they are "understaffed" they could subcontract the work to WMI (I'm starting to like their work...) Bet you can do a lot of research for $40 million, considering the whole deer audit only cost around $100,000.

Last edited by Screamin Steel; 02-25-2010 at 07:17 AM.
Screamin Steel is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-2010 | 07:47 AM
  #24  
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Default

they could hire my 103 year old mother and get the same results...of course yesterday she was telling me how her room at the nursing home is over run with coyotes
Potterco is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-2010 | 08:54 AM
  #25  
BTBowhunter's Avatar
Giant Nontypical
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
Default

Originally Posted by bluebird2
When did they revise the PA constitution to include a mandate for the PGC to manage for all wildlife?

I chose the wrong term. Replace it with legal or legislative.

The fact remains that the PGC is required by law to manage for all wildlife
BTBowhunter is offline  
Reply
Old 02-25-2010 | 09:00 AM
  #26  
Screamin Steel's Avatar
Typical Buck
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 659
Likes: 0
From:
Default

Originally Posted by Potterco
they could hire my 103 year old mother and get the same results...of course yesterday she was telling me how her room at the nursing home is over run with coyotes
LOL...if her nursing home is in NC PA it might just be overrun with coyotes! That's hilarious! (But I'm sad to hear it sounds like she's suffering from dementia or Alsheimers associated with her age. That's unfortunate, but she must be a tough ol' gal to make it to 103!)
Screamin Steel is offline  
Reply
Old 02-28-2010 | 08:09 AM
  #27  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
Default

"All that $ in reserve yet we lack any data on the results of AR, and WMI said available herd health data was insufficient to date. ??????? Why won't they ante up and pay for more research, esp if they think it would vindicate their management goals? Are they afraid it wouldn't?"
All they are afraid of is that hunters will once again have a say in matters, and their trillium and other garbage wont be growing on every hill at quadruple the rate of every other "normal" state.
Cornelius08 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2010 | 05:47 PM
  #28  
moosemike's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster co. PA
Default

if the PGC was doing so well they wouldn't be cutting so many programs, running understaffed, and nursing along old equipment like they are. Give them a license increase. It's time.
moosemike is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2010 | 06:02 PM
  #29  
Thread Starter
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
Default

"if the PGC was doing so well they wouldn't be cutting so many programs, running understaffed, and nursing along old equipment like they are."
They're doing just fine. They arent "overdoing it" spendingwise currently because they realize, due to their dogged stubbornness they may have to hold out awhile and make that money last.

They simply would like to have more money now so they can look into the details of their new "tool" contraception use, more spending for their biodiversity extreme wildlife action plan to be implemented, and want to quadruple the efforts of public brainwashing so they can try to get support that currently doesnt exist for the failed deer plan.

" Give them a license increase. It's time. "
Nope. You disagree, feel free to use the donation button on their site. Irresponsible mismanagement shouldnt be rewarded and enabled.
Cornelius08 is offline  
Reply
Old 03-02-2010 | 07:23 PM
  #30  
moosemike's Avatar
Fork Horn
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 277
Likes: 0
From: Lancaster co. PA
Default

I'd say the PGC is finally making an attempt to responsibly manage the state. For the last half of the last century they fouled it up. You like to talk about Trillium, that is one of the many plants that is finally coming back in the PA forests. And tree seedlings are growing.
moosemike is offline  
Reply


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.