Ah here we go. Anyone can view the poll thing. It's in the archives. You/Maverick are the only ones with polls where the time stamps showed votes after the poll closed. I put up an example poll stating from the very outset that It would be an experiment to see if polls could be manipulated as I suspected your polls to be fishy. I proved that the polls could be manipulated. Nothing more. You promptly had a huge hissy fit claiming at first that the polls couldn't be manipulated then even denying it once it was proven. Denial is something you know a lot about. If, as you say, I got caught skewing a poll, provide the link and prove it. You wont because you cant.

As a matter of fact, why not simply provide the link that can prove any of your alleged lies?

The simple answer is that you won't because you cant.

I think we all know who can't back up his accusation here.

"Ah here we go. Anyone can view the poll thing. It's in the archives. You/Maverick are the only ones with polls where the time stamps showed votes after the poll closed. I put up an example poll stating from the very outset that It would be an experiment to see if polls could be manipulated as I suspected your polls to be fishy. I proved that the polls could be manipulated. Nothing more."

See what I mean? A lying excuse for all your lies . And you want me to take the time to point out hundreds of them? lmao.


I already did!!! I pointed to the poll and the times. We had the discussion about "proving" it more than once as well. See what I mean? You want to send me on a "thread hunt" for every single word stated. well you sir can kiss my a-. I did that more than once and you lie about it anyway when proof is provided. One vote came in while you were online for the very short time period you used the "camp id" and the vote was within minutes of your post with that id. You were in the thread at the time and a vote "magically" appeared and the voting had been done with no votes coming in for some time prior to that. You are a lying fraud.

"I think we all know who can't back up his accusation here"

Yes and its YOU.

"How many other users have you accused me of being since Ive been on here? Everyone from bb to Maverick to others I cant even remember who dont post here regularly. Youve lied about things I have (or hadnt) said, as well as done the same for other posters on MANY occassions until it was pointed out in the posts. You've accused ME of skewing polls, only because YOU got caught doing so and it was first pointed out. Then had enough nerve to lie about not voting multiple after being caught red handed. You lie about lying on a daily basis where pgc is concerned, you lie other times just for the sake of hearing yourself lie, and too many petty meaningless lies to count. "

Like i said.

Well then, it should be easy..... simply provide a link

The most recent of many thousand.

Pretty much can pick any of your posts; http://www.huntingnet.com/forum/nort...update-11.html

Just like always. Your proof is a link to you calling me a liar. Well, you're right about one thing. Anyone can find plenty of posts where you call someone a liar and I'm often the one you gun for.

Now, how about some real proof. Something a bit more credible than Corny says so...........