![]() |
I'm probably missing the method, but did the site changes remove the ability to BLOCK posts!:confused::confused:
|
Glad to see we didn't implement AR's and I let em walk.
You can block someone, it's in your usercp.............................if you're that much of a girlyman.:0 |
Originally Posted by crokit
(Post 3383351)
I'm probably missing the method, but did the site changes remove the ability to BLOCK posts!:confused::confused:
|
Originally Posted by Charlie P
(Post 3383360)
Glad to see we didn't implement AR's and I let em walk.
You can block someone, it's in your usercp.............................if you're that much of a girlyman.:0 LMAO! I've been called ALOT worse:):jaw: |
I would have favored AR's on state land, and I let them run. |
I hunt state land in Chenango County. Judging by what I've seen over the last few years, NY state land in that area doesn't need ARs. We've seen and taken some real decent bucks on NY state land.
|
STEVEBNY says;
![]() |
Crokit, I dont hold a grudge against those who dont like ar, and I dont see any reason why anyone should hold one against those who support them.
I support it myself because the buck population has always been age poor here, and i think it would be worse without ar. I think if we had ar prior to hitting extremes with some of the reduction then kept the herd stable we would have seenmore gains with only some reduction. Another reason I support ar, is that I think that most do support ar, at least that is my opinion from those I hear from on the issues as well as overall on the message boards. My gripe, like i said is all the excess reduction. I dont think ar is a black and white issue....either right or wrong. I also dont think its a big "biological issue". I think it more a matter of hunter opinion as to wether it should or shouldnt be. I could be wrong, but I believe more than half would like to see it continue. Hunter desires may not mean much to pgc these days, but it does play somewhat of a role in wether I support an issue or not. |
I dont think ar is a black and white issue....either right or wrong. I also dont think its a big "biological issue". I think it more a matter of hunter opinion as to wether it should or shouldnt be. I could be wrong, but I believe more than half would like to see it continue. Hunter desires may not mean much to pgc these days, but it does play somewhat of a role in wether I support an issue or not. |
Originally Posted by Cornelius08
(Post 3383560)
Crokit, I dont hold a grudge against those who dont like ar, and I dont see any reason why anyone should hold one against those who support them.
I support it myself because the buck population has always been age poor here, and i think it would be worse without ar. I think if we had ar prior to hitting extremes with some of the reduction then kept the herd stable we would have seenmore gains with only some reduction. Another reason I support ar, is that I think that most do support ar, at least that is my opinion from those I hear from on the issues as well as overall on the message boards. My gripe, like i said is all the excess reduction. I dont think ar is a black and white issue....either right or wrong. I also dont think its a big "biological issue". I think it more a matter of hunter opinion as to wether it should or shouldnt be. I could be wrong, but I believe more than half would like to see it continue. Hunter desires may not mean much to pgc these days, but it does play somewhat of a role in wether I support an issue or not. I just happen to agree with AR's standing on it's own, without herd reduction issues and the nonsense that you guys are dealing with down in your neck of the woods. I don't know enough to comment on what you have on your hands, as is more than apparent neither do some who are on your side. Know what I mean? LMAO. Keep up the good fight. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 PM. |
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.