They all seem to have that Same distinctive "whine" like a wheel bearing going bad.[]

"LMFAO"

It's funny how the voices of so "many", have become as silent as a single lamb.

It wont be long now. The mouthy one is probably gathering up his multiple personalities and gearing up for a mob assault!

The bird is busy manufacturing a new batch of "facts"

""The minority is easy to tell, just like in Chicago politics they are the few whom post as many.""

Kinda like the naturalists, dcnr guysand audubonpgc yes men who postand pretend their interest isthat of ahunter? LMAO! See hpa for reference.

"The mouthy one is probably gathering up his multiple personalities and gearing up for a mob assault! "

And the bearded fool is probably surfing gay porn sitesin between posting, waiting to unleash another non-funny insult! LMAO!

I will repeat my question. Perhaps you can put your sillyness aside a moment to form an adult response. If you are capable. How do you know who the minority is and who the majority is? Or is this just another stupid statement you pulled out of your butt before your mind had time to engage and evaluate what was coming out of your juvenile mouth.

I beg to differ,good hunting is an eltitlement when we are forced to pay their prices,abide by "their" rules, be force fed their propoganda,and have virtually no say in the running of the PGC and it's policies !!!

Ahh let me count the ways...

First is the notable fact that only one very small organization has participated as an organization in the use of the fee increase for blackmail. All the rest are either on record supporting the increase or are neutral on the subject. PFSC, UBP, NWTF,RGS,RMEF,PF etc etc.

Setting aside the USP website, which doesnt allow nonmembers to even view their forum. Everyoutdoor forum where PA is a subject other than this one shows overwhelming support for a license increase. Here it seems to be 50/50 but, of course, we all know that this site has become the last stopping point for posters that have been banned elswhere and even here for that matter. Notably, every single one who refers to being banned elsewhere,hsa expressed views opposing the fee increase. Common sense says that this site isn't representative of the states sportsmen.

Finally, theres the age old documented fact that people tend to speak up when unhappy or angry but when content, we don't hear from them. Marketing research, politcal polls etc have varied between a 3-1to as much as 10-1 ratio between the content (the 3 to 10) vs the non content (the 1) in terms of being motivated to speak out on an issue.

Of course this will induced a bold print technicolorranting tantrum from the cornhole and a barrage of numbers from the bird but it is undeniable that the USP stands alone among all the other organized sportsmens groups with its' paltry estimated 2000 members in leading the opposition for a license increase.

There may be some obscure group I may have missed but my point has been made.

What proof do you have that the dissenters represent a majority???

The last time I checked , they were called hunting privlages. Nobody is holding a gun to your head to buy a hunting tag. If you think Pa is expensive, buy a outfitter sponsered combination elk/deer tag for non resident fromMontana,$1500 bucks! If you want to play your going to pay.

What, pray tell leads you to believe that good hunting is an entitlement?