HuntingNet.com Forums - Does This Sound Familiar

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)

- Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)

- - Does This Sound Familiar (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/287274-does-sound-familiar.html)

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

And you don't even understand what RDD stands for, so you made something up and now you want to change the subject to belittling me. Nice try. If you know so much about RDD why don't you list the RDDs for 2B , 2g and 2F and then explain how the PGC is managing those herds based on the RDD goals.

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

Quote:

ORIGINAL: bluebird2

And you don't even understand what RDD stands for, so you made something up and now you want to change the subject to belittling me. Nice try. If you know so much about RDD why don't you list the RDDs for 2B , 2g and 2F and then explain how the PGC is managing those herds based on the RDD goals.

So the P.G.C is doing a fine job managing deer according to you on 19 of 22 W.M.U.'s state wide All but 2B ,2G & 2F.
I think thats a success rate we all can be happy with.

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

You're just being silly and trying to get some attention and start a fight . I never said the PGC was doing a fine job of managing the herd in those WMUs . I ask BTB to provide the RDD goals , but he doesn't even know what RDD means.

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

Quote:

ORIGINAL: bawanajim

I think it has something to do with a 5 % drop in breathing rates,and that is directly tied to the failed attempts in the past to educate PA hunters about how little we really know about breathing and its affects on our habitat,stable and constant breathing is a goal we should all strive for,not just for ourselves but for future breathers as well.[&:]

What grade are you presently in BJ? 8th, maybe 9th? Don't you have homework to do?

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

Quote:

ORIGINAL: bluebird2

Can anyone guess when the PGC made this statement.

Quote:

An antlerless season was held in 19XX and again 19XX. License allocations were predicated on trends in the antlered deer season,crop damage ,winter mortality,highway mortality , range conditions and the reproductive capacity of the herd.

It is gratifying to enlighten sportsman,farmers ,foresters and game managers to see that the commissions policy is bringing back some of the heavily overbrowsed areas..that range conditions are improving and crop damage is decreasing...all indications that the basic premise of the deer program( that is maintaining maximum breeding stock consistent with existing food supply) is paying dividends

I highlighted the part that I found particularly interesting. The PGC believed that their program at the time with a short doe season with fairly low allocations was producing significant regeneration even in overbrowsed habitat,visible decreases inreported crop damage,yet today PGC and their supporters are claiming poor regeneration even with owdd below 10dpsm in many areas. So what has changed? Deer still browse the same species as before. How can much lower DD today produce less regeneration than decades ago? How about pollution and timber pratices? Btw, I'll guess circa 1975.

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

Quote:

ORIGINAL: bluebird2

You're just being silly and trying to get some attention and start a fight . I never said the PGC was doing a fine job of managing the herd in those WMUs . I ask BTB to provide the RDD goals , but he doesn't even know what RDD means.

I'm thinking it has something to do with redundancy.;)

So what other W.M.U. has the P.G.C. destroyed the future of deer hunting in besides your particular three?:eek:

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

Quote:

So what other W.M.U. has the P.G.C. destroyed the future of deer hunting in besides your particular three?

Do you get some sick satisfaction from intentionally misrepresenting what other people post?

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

Quote:

ORIGINAL: bluebird2

Quote:

So what other W.M.U. has the P.G.C. destroyed the future of deer hunting in besides your particular three?

Do you get some sick satisfaction from intentionally misrepresenting what other people post?

You do it in practically every post that you make, I was just using your tactics to defeat your argumentative style of posting that lacks any credible evidence beyond your pointless repetitive aversion to the facts.

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

Quote:

Go find em yourself. Understanding relative deer density and using it to to calculate optimal sustained yeild doesn't require memorizing the actual numbers for each WMU. Thats what we pay the wildlife biologists to do.
Be careful when you accuse people of making things up. Just like your plagarism accusation on Jim, you'll wind up with egg all over your face again.

RE: Does This Sound Familiar

Quote:

Thank you for once again proving you do not understand the current deer management plan. Remember the PGC claims they don't have RDD goals for each WMU and you just admitted that you did not know that. You also admitted that you didn't know the PGC was not managing the herd at the optimal sustainable yield. What would you like to admit you don't know now?