REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
02-05-2009 | 03:32 PM
#11
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
ORIGINAL: DougE
What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
02-05-2009 | 04:04 PM
#12
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
You like to point to the 8% harvest rate in the study as an indication that hunters aren't harvesting enough deer to reduce the herd. However, the only reason they are offering a reward is so they get some data that comes closer to representing what is really happening.
Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
ORIGINAL: DougE
What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
02-05-2009 | 04:24 PM
#14
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
You like to point to the 8% harvest rate in the study as an indication that hunters aren't harvesting enough deer to reduce the herd. However, the only reason they are offering a reward is so they get some data that comes closer to representing what is really happening.
Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
ORIGINAL: DougE
What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
02-05-2009 | 04:33 PM
#15
Thread Starter
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 5,195
Likes: 0
From: PA.
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
ORIGINAL: bowtruck
then my guess is sprouls area wont get to many rewards
then my guess is sprouls area wont get to many rewards
i think they may do study in same areas as before.
dont think for minute that localDCNR boys will not know where everyone of those doe are,they are making plans now for early in-line season to get that money.
02-05-2009 | 05:11 PM
#16
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter
Just like Babblebird to find a way to criticize an attempt to produce more accurate results to a study.
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
You like to point to the 8% harvest rate in the study as an indication that hunters aren't harvesting enough deer to reduce the herd. However, the only reason they are offering a reward is so they get some data that comes closer to representing what is really happening.
Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
ORIGINAL: DougE
What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
What the heck,isn't the USP offering up a $10,000 reward for any mountain lions shot?
Now here are the cold facts. From 2004 to 2007 the harvests in 4B reduced the PS DD from 23 DPSM to 18 DPSM and the herd in 2G dropped from 16 PS in 2004 to 10 PS DPSM in 2007. Therefore, the results form the doe survival study are highly flawed and the PGC is trying to correct that by offering a reward.
02-05-2009 | 05:34 PM
#17
Typical Buck
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
From: PA
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
Mostly "just goes to show" the kind of things you think are funny,may only befunny to you and others that share yourviews.
Doubt most would think the loss of an expensive monitoring collar bought with our license dollars, isa laughing matter. Then again,theclown that put it on the truck probablythought it was as funny as you do?
Doubt most would think the loss of an expensive monitoring collar bought with our license dollars, isa laughing matter. Then again,theclown that put it on the truck probablythought it was as funny as you do?
02-05-2009 | 05:49 PM
#19
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
You're worried about that "expensive" collar? Well I dont think blowingMILLIONS through the last several yearson "pushing agendas" and blowing cash on trying to brainwash us with habitat tours, hiring biodiversity nut biologists, pamphlets, online resources, open houses, videosand other nonsense is very funny either, but such is life.
02-05-2009 | 06:07 PM
#20
Giant Nontypical
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 7,220
Likes: 0
From: SW PA USA
RE: REWARDS FOR DOE IN PA.
ORIGINAL: Cornelius08
You're worried about that "expensive" collar? Well I dont think blowingMILLIONS through the last several yearson "pushing agendas" and blowing cash on trying to brainwash us with habitat tours, hiring biodiversity nut biologists, pamphlets, online resources, open houses, videosand other nonsense is very funny either, but such is life.
You're worried about that "expensive" collar? Well I dont think blowingMILLIONS through the last several yearson "pushing agendas" and blowing cash on trying to brainwash us with habitat tours, hiring biodiversity nut biologists, pamphlets, online resources, open houses, videosand other nonsense is very funny either, but such is life.
