PGC data flawed
#36
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 169
RE: PGC data flawed
When they did the fly over Douge, How many turkeys was also recorded?
That data should of been collected also at the time? Every wildlife that was seen during the fly over should of been recorded for future reference.How many turkeys was seen and recorded?
That data should of been collected also at the time? Every wildlife that was seen during the fly over should of been recorded for future reference.How many turkeys was seen and recorded?
#37
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,262
RE: PGC data flawed
They flew over that part of MSF in march of 2005.This was DCNR'Sproject,not the PGC's.DCNR doesn't care how many turkeys they have.They're concerned about deer because deer impact the habitat,turkeys do not.Where do you come up with this stuff?
#38
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 169
RE: PGC data flawed
ORIGINAL: DougE
They flew over that part of MSF in march of 2005.This was DCNR'Sproject,not the PGC's.DCNR doesn't care how many turkeys they have.They're concerned about deer because deer impact the habitat,turkeys do not.Where do you come up with this stuff?
They flew over that part of MSF in march of 2005.This was DCNR'Sproject,not the PGC's.DCNR doesn't care how many turkeys they have.They're concerned about deer because deer impact the habitat,turkeys do not.Where do you come up with this stuff?
Turkey do so impact the habitat. They eat seedlings and new plant growth also. Haven't you ever seen them around newly planted fields? To say they don't affect habitat is something a stupid person would say.You got a hybrid turkey that causes no habitat loss and feeds on nothing to grow in PA?
#40
RE: PGC data flawed
ORIGINAL: DougE
The doe mortality study shows that hunters are killingless than 8% of the doe.
The doe mortality study shows that hunters are killingless than 8% of the doe.