Just keep making up your lies,since that is all you have.

yeah btb if it doesnt fit into bb agenda it has to be flawed ,misleading,false thuoght you knew that

Can someone post a link to all of the FLIR results currently available?

Just go to DCNR's link.The flir results are all there.

Did you see the PGC revised the 40% increase in the herd in 2G in 2006 from 40% down to 6%? That mistake resulted in a 23% decrease in the herd in 2G in 2007.

When they did the fly over Douge, How many turkeys was also recorded?
That data should of been collected also at the time? Every wildlife that was seen during the fly over should of been recorded for future reference.How many turkeys was seen and recorded?

They flew over that part of MSF in march of 2005.This was DCNR'Sproject,not the PGC's.DCNR doesn't care how many turkeys they have.They're concerned about deer because deer impact the habitat,turkeys do not.Where do you come up with this stuff?

So how do you know all the animalsthey seen was deer?Was they close enough to the ground they could make out their body lines while useing the thermal image device? So what they seen can not be confirmed that they was all deer.

Turkey do so impact the habitat. They eat seedlings and new plant growth also. Haven't you ever seen them around newly planted fields? To say they don't affect habitat is something a stupid person would say.You got a hybrid turkey that causes no habitat loss and feeds on nothing to grow in PA?

Go on the website and look.They use low-flying aircraft andthe pictures clearly show deer.There used to be actual pictures,not sure if there still is.

Yea but the realvalue of that study would have been knowing how many hunters were required to kill those 8 percent. Knowing the success rate would have been very beneficial to forming allocation formulas. What a concept eh? Just knowing that 8 percent of the collared doe that were harvested by hunters is meaningless without knowing the number of hunters that were required to achieve that 8 percent.