ORIGINAL: DougE
The doe mortality study shows that hunters are killingless than 8% of the doe.
Yea but the realvalue of that study would have been knowing how many hunters were required to kill those 8 percent. Knowing the success rate would have been very beneficial to forming allocation formulas. What a concept eh? Just knowing that 8 percent of the collared doe that were harvested by hunters is meaningless without knowing the number of hunters that were required to achieve that 8 percent.