Once again the USP screws everyone including themselves
#52
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Once again the USP screws everyone including themselves
i would be the worst salesman in the world. i would want to sell everything for what I thought it was worth and that would mean i would go broke over night. I turn candle holders,plant stands and vases and make walnut coffee table and I don't make a nickel because I sell them for what i would want to pay rather than for what they are worth in man hours.
#54
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 584
RE: Once again the USP screws everyone including themselves
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Thank you for admitting that the habitat in 2F is worse than the habitat in 2G since the doe in 2F produce 1.34 embryos/doe while in 2G the doe produce 1.66 embryos /doe. So forest health and herd health in 2F are both worse than in 2G yet the PGC is managing the herd in 2F at almost twice that of 2G . Thanks for proving I am right and you are ,WRONG AGAIN!
When you measure the health of the deer (the productive rates of adult does and the breeding rates for the juvenile does) you are measuring all of the habitat those deer live on, farm land, forest land or any where they feed. Therefore your claim that all habitat isn’t measured is incorrect and misleading at the least.
No one said the food supply wasn’t worse per individual deer in unit 2F, it very well could be. In fact, both the deer and habitat indicate that is probably true.
That still doesn’t negate the fact that the over all habitat in unit 2F can and has been able to support more deer per square mile then unit 2G.
Just because you don’t like or understand the facts doesn’t make them any less fact.
R.S. Bodenhorn
#55
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Once again the USP screws everyone including themselves
No one said the food supply wasn’t worse per individual deer in unit 2F, it very well could be. In fact, both the deer and habitat indicate that is probably true.
That still doesn’t negate the fact that the over all habitat in unit 2F can and has been able to support more deer per square mile then unit 2G.
#56
Typical Buck
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 584
RE: Once again the USP screws everyone including themselves
ORIGINAL: bluebird2
Since you admit that is true ,why hasn't the PGC reduced the herd in 2F to the same DD as in 2G? That has been my question from day one and you just admitted I was right.
But that is only because the the PGC hasn't issued enough doe tags to reduce the herd in 2F to the same DD as in 2G . therefore you have admitted the PGC is mismanaging the herd in 2F.
No one said the food supply wasn’t worse per individual deer in unit 2F, it very well could be. In fact, both the deer and habitat indicate that is probably true.
That still doesn’t negate the fact that the over all habitat in unit 2F can and has been able to support more deer per square mile then unit 2G.
I don’t know if your that seriously reading deficient,playingstupidor just being misleading again, but I never said any of what you are implying.
I explained in the first time, the second time and third, apparently you just aren’t bright enough to understand.
The deer totally of the 2F habitat supports more deer then the totality of the 2G habitat.
I do expect the ANF to issue DMAP again this year, after failing to do so the past two years, so that should help do just what you think should be done. And, yes I fully agree that we need to harvest more deer in many if not most parts of unit 2F. I’ve been saying that all along. I think we should harvest more in 2G too. Now how do you like that?
R.S. Bodenhorn
#57
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Once again the USP screws everyone including themselves
The deer totally of the 2F habitat supports more deer then the totality of the 2G habitat.
#58
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location:
Posts: 2,978
RE: Once again the USP screws everyone including themselves
"I think we should harvest more in 2G too. Now how do you like that?"
I heard pgcwhere gonna double the 2G allocation.Decision was based on the science of seeing a doe in a neighboring wmuwithin 3 miles of the 2 G border.
I heard pgcwhere gonna double the 2G allocation.Decision was based on the science of seeing a doe in a neighboring wmuwithin 3 miles of the 2 G border.
#59
RE: Once again the USP screws everyone including themselves
ORIGINAL: Cornelius08
"I think we should harvest more in 2G too. Now how do you like that?"
I heard pgcwhere gonna double the 2G allocation.Decision was based on the science of seeing a doe in a neighboring wmuwithin 3 miles of the 2 G border.
"I think we should harvest more in 2G too. Now how do you like that?"
I heard pgcwhere gonna double the 2G allocation.Decision was based on the science of seeing a doe in a neighboring wmuwithin 3 miles of the 2 G border.
#60
Nontypical Buck
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
RE: Once again the USP screws everyone including themselves
I’ve been saying that all along. I think we should harvest more in 2G too. Now how do you like that?