ORIGINAL: bluebird2
No one said the food supply wasn’t worse per individual deer in unit 2F, it very well could be. In fact, both the deer and habitat indicate that is probably true.
Since you admit that is true ,why hasn't the PGC reduced the herd in 2F to the same DD as in 2G? That has been my question from day one and you just admitted I was right.
That still doesn’t negate the fact that the over all habitat in unit 2F can and has been able to support more deer per square mile then unit 2G.
But that is only because the the PGC hasn't issued enough doe tags to reduce the herd in 2F to the same DD as in 2G . therefore you have admitted the PGC is mismanaging the herd in 2F.
I don’t know if your that seriously reading deficient,playingstupidor just being misleading again, but I never said any of what you are implying.
I explained in the first time, the second time and third, apparently you just aren’t bright enough to understand.
The deer totally of the 2F habitat supports more deer then the totality of the 2G habitat.
I do expect the ANF to issue DMAP again this year, after failing to do so the past two years, so that should help do just what you think should be done. And, yes I fully agree that we need to harvest more deer in many if not most parts of unit 2F. I’ve been saying that all along. I think we should harvest more in 2G too. Now how do you like that?
R.S. Bodenhorn