HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/281559-ars-survival-weak-scrawny.html)

BTBowhunter 01-09-2009 05:21 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

ORIGINAL: Cornelius08

Ha ha ha. Nice to accept crap and pgc mismanagement when you have a good spot in Illinois to ahem..."hunt". (LOL)

My lil' 7 year old nephew could kill a decent buck in Illinois! (LOL)(LOL)
read it again slower skippy. Two of those are from PA

bluebird2 01-09-2009 05:28 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 
And anyone that knows anything about aging deer,knows that tooth wear is inaccurate after 2.5 years. In order to determine the age of a 5.5 buck it is necessary to examine a cross section of a tooth.

Do Tex. deer teeth age the same way as PA deer? how about Miss. deer? do their antlers grow based on the same principles?

BTBowhunter 01-09-2009 05:33 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 
Tooth wear is an accepted method of ESTIMATING age. Not perfect but still used by game agencies across the country. You're really grasping at straws arent you???

bluebird2 01-09-2009 05:35 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 
Wrong again sport. Tooth wear has been rejected as an acceptable method for aging buck older than 2.5 yrs.

BTBowhunter 01-09-2009 05:52 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 
What part of

"not perfect but still used by game agencies across the country"

and "estimate"

didn't you understand?

bluebird2 01-09-2009 06:03 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 
So you admit the buck you claimed to be 5.5 was just an estimate or a guess ,just like the PGC harvest data . So what was the margin of error on that guess ? was it two or three years/

BTBowhunter 01-09-2009 06:15 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 
Since you don't know the difference, I got you some help from Webster...


1guess
Pronunciation:
\ˈges\
Function:
verb
Etymology:
Middle English gessen, perhaps of Scandinavian origin; akin to Norwegian & Swedish gissa to guess, Middle Dutch gissen, gessen, Old Norse geta to get, guess — more at get
Date:
14th century
transitive verb 1 : to form an opinion of from little or no evidence 2 : believe , suppose <I guess you're right> 3 : to arrive at a correct conclusion about by conjecture, chance, or intuition <guess the answer> intransitive verb : to make a guess
[/align][/align][/align]

[/align]
1es·ti·mate [/align]Pronunciation:
\ˈes-tə-ˌmāt\
Function:
transitive verb
Inflected Form(s):
es·ti·mat·ed; es·ti·mat·ing
Etymology:
Latin aestimatus, past participle of aestimare to value, estimate
Date:
circa 1532
1archaic a: esteem b: appraise2 a: to judge tentatively or approximately the value, worth, or significance of b: to determine roughly the size, extent, or nature of c: to produce a statement of the approximate cost of3: judge , conclude[/align]— es·ti·ma·tive \-ˌmā-tiv\ adjective [/align]synonyms estimate , appraise , evaluate , value , rate , assess mean to judge something with respect to its worth or significance. estimate implies a judgment, considered or casual, that precedes or takes the place of actual measuring or counting or testing out <estimated the crowd at two hundred>. appraise commonly implies the fixing by an expert of the monetary worth of a thing, but it may be used of any critical judgment <having their house appraised>. evaluate suggests an attempt to determine relative or intrinsic worth in terms other than monetary <evaluate a student's work>. value equals appraise but without implying expertness of judgment <a watercolor valued by the donor at $500>. rate adds to estimate the notion of placing a thing according to a scale of values <a highly rated restaurant>. assess implies a critical appraisal for the purpose of understanding or interpreting, or as a guide in taking action <officials are trying to assess the damage>.[/align]
[/align]
The margin of error is more like a year at that stage of tooth wear.

I guess you've never needed to age a deer and I probably shouldn't have expected you to know that. I apologize for assuming that you would know about these things.

bluebird2 01-09-2009 06:20 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 

The margin of error is more like a year at that stage of tooth wear.
How do you know that? When will you ever provide anything to support your claims? you keep making things up hoping someone will believe something you post. Try again!!

BTBowhunter 01-09-2009 06:27 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 
You're embarassing yourself. Move on.

bowtruck 01-09-2009 06:35 PM

RE: ARs= The Survival of the Weak and Scrawny
 
btb thats a year either way right?


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:36 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.