Do you agree with extent of Herd Reduction in Pa?
#61
Banned
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
ORIGINAL: WestVirginiaBrent
Have the concerned hunters done anything as simple as posting up some poster board signs right before rifle season asking the yahoo's to not kill every doe they see? If the state won't help use peer pressure and greass roots measures.
Have the concerned hunters done anything as simple as posting up some poster board signs right before rifle season asking the yahoo's to not kill every doe they see? If the state won't help use peer pressure and greass roots measures.
#62
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Alt was a also a great source of mis-information and he was paid by the PGC for blatantly lying to the hunters of PA and those lies are continuing to this day.
#63
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,212
Likes: 0
From: 3c pa
maybe its a good thingalt has been gone for awhile then
i think some would blame alt if they still had 100 deer on there 20 acre and didnt kill 10 of them
i think some would blame alt if they still had 100 deer on there 20 acre and didnt kill 10 of them
#64
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
PA hunters reduced the pre-season herd by 600K deer in just in just 6 years. Can you point to any other state where hunters are as effective at controlling the herd as in PA?
#65
I can only speak of what I experience. In my part of 2D I have not seen any noticeable herd reduction. I do some hunting in 2A and I see enough deer to make it worth my while. I do not know what it was before HR, but its ceratinly not hurting where I hunt.
While not hunting, I do go camping & hiking around various parts of the state, typically state forest or Nat'l forest. Some places I see no deer, but also see no good deer habitat. Some places I was actually shocked at the numbers of deer I saw because I heard things were so bad.
I still see FAR more deer and deer sign in PA than I do in Ohio.
While not hunting, I do go camping & hiking around various parts of the state, typically state forest or Nat'l forest. Some places I see no deer, but also see no good deer habitat. Some places I was actually shocked at the numbers of deer I saw because I heard things were so bad.
I still see FAR more deer and deer sign in PA than I do in Ohio.
#68
Thread Starter
Banned
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 2,978
Likes: 0
From:
"Yeah,the conspiracy theorist for the USP is a great source for info.Then again,he is special."
Doesnt matter who says it Doug. A fact is a fact. You dont have to like the person conveying it.
Rybo says: 'I do some hunting in 2A and I see enough deer to make it worth my while. I do not know what it was before HR, but its ceratinly not hurting where I hunt. "
2A was reduced over 50% of the previous high ow herd. That is even though the human conflict was alway low and the habitat never rated as poor. Therefore we can only conclude it was some form of preventative measures? That being the case, and no real problems existing,it would have been understandable to have had slight reductions, of maybe 10%-20% or so,but there was no reason at all for the extremes. 2A, generally speaking still has more deer than many areas of Pa. That isnt saying much considering other areas, and also considering 2A has some of the best habitat type in the state and SHOULD have far more than most areas because of it. Nonmountainous, not the thin soils, climate, and has about 10X the edge habitat deer prefer, not vast expanses of mature timber. The goal for 3 years prior to this one was stabilization. Problem is, it only took 45,000 doe tags when Pgc had the supposed final year of herd reduction according to pgc annual reports(approx 7% that year), yeteven thoughthe the herd was smaller and the goal supposedly no longer reduction, but instead STABILIZATION, the allocation unexplicably went up by 10,000 tags!!! (LOL) And stayed there until last year!!!When it went up yet again, another 5k! (LOL)
When there was actual reduction we harvested 16,500 antlerlessaccording to pgc. OUr goal every year since has been 18,000 for some strange reason.
We also had all time high allocation last year, + ehd that wiped out many areas, with pgcs last conservative guestimation at around 3500 dead. What was pgcs response? Another extreme 55,000 allocation the same as we've had 3 out of the last 4 years![:'(]
The excessive reduction and continuing trend has far from spared 2A. Only places that may be the case in the state are the sras, where the plan cannot touch. Which also happens to be the best deer numbers and quality in the state.
"I still see FAR more deer and deer sign in PA than I do in Ohio."
You are the first person that I have seen on any of the Pa message boards that huntsboth states and make that claim. I see far more in 3 counties of Southeast Ohio when I hunt out there. And the quality? NO COMPARISON.
Doesnt matter who says it Doug. A fact is a fact. You dont have to like the person conveying it.
Rybo says: 'I do some hunting in 2A and I see enough deer to make it worth my while. I do not know what it was before HR, but its ceratinly not hurting where I hunt. "
2A was reduced over 50% of the previous high ow herd. That is even though the human conflict was alway low and the habitat never rated as poor. Therefore we can only conclude it was some form of preventative measures? That being the case, and no real problems existing,it would have been understandable to have had slight reductions, of maybe 10%-20% or so,but there was no reason at all for the extremes. 2A, generally speaking still has more deer than many areas of Pa. That isnt saying much considering other areas, and also considering 2A has some of the best habitat type in the state and SHOULD have far more than most areas because of it. Nonmountainous, not the thin soils, climate, and has about 10X the edge habitat deer prefer, not vast expanses of mature timber. The goal for 3 years prior to this one was stabilization. Problem is, it only took 45,000 doe tags when Pgc had the supposed final year of herd reduction according to pgc annual reports(approx 7% that year), yeteven thoughthe the herd was smaller and the goal supposedly no longer reduction, but instead STABILIZATION, the allocation unexplicably went up by 10,000 tags!!! (LOL) And stayed there until last year!!!When it went up yet again, another 5k! (LOL)
When there was actual reduction we harvested 16,500 antlerlessaccording to pgc. OUr goal every year since has been 18,000 for some strange reason.
We also had all time high allocation last year, + ehd that wiped out many areas, with pgcs last conservative guestimation at around 3500 dead. What was pgcs response? Another extreme 55,000 allocation the same as we've had 3 out of the last 4 years![:'(]
The excessive reduction and continuing trend has far from spared 2A. Only places that may be the case in the state are the sras, where the plan cannot touch. Which also happens to be the best deer numbers and quality in the state.
"I still see FAR more deer and deer sign in PA than I do in Ohio."
You are the first person that I have seen on any of the Pa message boards that huntsboth states and make that claim. I see far more in 3 counties of Southeast Ohio when I hunt out there. And the quality? NO COMPARISON.
#69
Nontypical Buck
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
ORIGINAL: germain
These acorns weren't hollow doug.Simply no deer.
These acorns weren't hollow doug.Simply no deer.


