HuntingNet.com Forums - pa antler restrictions yes or no?

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)

- Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)

- - pa antler restrictions yes or no? (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/275547-pa-antler-restrictions-yes-no.html)

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

Quote:

ORIGINAL: Cornelius08

"No one other than Gary Alt can say for certain what Gary Alt would be doing with PA right now and he aint talkin. As always, your conclusion is nothing more than your own speculation crafted to fit your agenda "

You mean like this?:

"My bet would be thatALt would have done some of the needed changing by now."

"My bet would be" is speculation,this is dd's quote as posted.

Quote:

Alt would be still promoting further herd reduction.

No speculation here, written as fact as dd is prone to do.[:@]

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

THe only time anything will ever change is if ever the boc is a "prohunting" majority, and not kept to a few lame ducks with majority being handpicked ecoextremists.

Even where changes are being claimed such as going from "reduction" to "stabilization", its a HUGE lie. Simply can not-- CAN NOT claim the herd hasnt been reduced anymore in one wmu in the 3 years prior to this one, when the allocations rose from 45k, all the way up to SIXTY-K! The havest of 16500 with 45k tags originally was stated by pgc in 2004 report as having reduced the herd approx. 7%... Then had a harvest goal of 18k and 55 to 60000 tags every year since! With supposed goal of STABILIZATION!(LOL)

Im sorry, But they have lied and lied and lied some more. Im sick of it. Sick of insulting my intelligence, sick of them not caring one lick about the hunters of this state.[:'(] The boc and some of the staff needs cleaned out big time.

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

"No speculation here, writen as fact as dd is prone to do"

I saw no more or less "speculating" in either statement. Neither know 100% as fact, both believe they have a pretty good guestimation. Myself, knowing Dr. Alt was nothing but a large part of the problem, Id lean towards him supporting the further reduction scenario. He displayed his idiocy when the ecoweineys took him by the hand into the forest, pointed out a browseline,and he madecomments like the thousands and thousands of miles of forest ruined drove him to his knees! (LOL) I still get a chuckle every time I recall that'n.:D

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

Believe me when I say I have no plans for a child named Gary.;)

The HR has gone to far and most know that , and in fact I believe it is the blackmail device behind a licence increase. That being said it is hunters who are bitiching yet it is hunters pulling the triggers ,you can't have your cake and eat it too.

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

I've been saying that the whole time.

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

Quote:

ORIGINAL: bluebird2

You really are a total ignoramus if you don't know that Alt favored an over kill and I am not about to waste my time finding the quote to satisfy a mind numbed robot like you. You haven't provided anything to support your asinine claims,so there is no reason for me to honor your demands.

Yet another distortion that you can't back up. You won't even try to produce it because you made it up. How do you like to say it? Oh yeah, crawl back under your rock and lick your wounds!

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

Quote:

ORIGINAL: BTBowhunter

Coalcracker

Instead of taking a shot at Bawanajim maybe you ought to take an extensive trip through some archives. Bawanajim has made many worthwhile contributions over the years. We've had strong disagreements at times so I say this out of mutual respect and not because he and I always agree.

You need to understand that Bluebird2 has beenremoved from this forum over the years undernumerous other screen names. He does not deny this when it's pointed out. The mod whoformerly kept this area a bit more civil is not n here much any more.BB2 is the lowest common denominator on the Northeast boards and many of us are soweary of his cleverly crafted and relentless distortions that the responses to BB2 degenerate down to a level that he alone deserves.

If everyone is so tired of Bluebird's comments, this thread wouldn't be thirty some pages in length. Obviously someone finds his discussions interesting enough to read and respond to them, even if it is in disagreement. Even if you completely disagree with the man 100% of the time, no one can argue that he generates an extraordinary amountof response to his topics and posts....which means more hits on a website/ message board....which means that to the good folks at Hunting.net he is a very valuable contributor. Would you have him gone simply because you disagree with him?

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

Quote:

Yet another distortion that you can't back up

No, it is not a distortion. and from Alt's perspective it makes perfect sense. Remember , he also said that if hunters didn't harvest enough doe he would do whatever it took to reduce the herd to the PGC's desired goal.

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

I know we're not to concered with facts any more ,but when was the last time Gary Alt worked in or forthe state of PA.:eek:

RE: pa antler restrictions yes or no?

Shhh! Don't say that name and get him started again.

BLAH BLAH...Alt Lied deer died...BLAH BLAH
BLAH....BTB. BLAH....LIVBUCKS BLAH....JIMBO
BLAH BUSH"S FAULT
RSB...BLAH BLAH BLAH