HuntingNet.com Forums

HuntingNet.com Forums (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/)
-   Northeast (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast-26/)
-   -   PA antler restriction (https://www.huntingnet.com/forum/northeast/256182-pa-antler-restriction.html)

White-tail-deer 08-11-2008 07:01 PM

RE: PA antler restriction
 
What does this have to do with PA Antler restrictions? Maybe it's just me....:eek:

BTBowhunter 08-11-2008 07:12 PM

RE: PA antler restriction
 

ORIGINAL: bluebird2

The data I posted was provided by WCO Dick Bodenhorn. Would you like to call him a liar just like you routinely call me a liar? PGC supporters often have trouble with dealing with reality because their preconceived perceptions are contradicted by the facts. And the facts are that archers do very little to help control the herd while at the same time they cherry pick the bucks and complain about the introduction of X-bows.
I didn't challenge the percentage of 2B that has trees but you have no basis for inferring howmuch of that forested areamay or may not fall within the safety zone rules. It's simply a fact of life in 2B that archery hunting is allowed or welcomed on a huge number of properties where gun hunting is simply not allowed. Usually thats simply the choice of the private property owners and the vast majority of 2B isprivate property.
It's also important to note that much of the pulic property in 2B where hunting is allowed is restricted to bowhunting only by the municpality that owns it.

You have not presented any data that shows how much of 2B falls into a safety zone that would prove Gregs statement wrong. We will waitfor youto find thatdocumentation and get back to us

bluebird2 08-11-2008 07:25 PM

RE: PA antler restriction
 

I didn't challenge the percentage of 2B that has trees but you have no basis for inferring how much of that forested area may or may not fall within the safety zone rules
Wrong again. I presented the data that showed only 20% of 2b was developed while 57% was forested. Based on the USFS criteria forested land does not include residences that require a safety zone..

Also, would you care to explain why if firearms hunters have less access than archers, why those hunters harvested 8,900 antlerless in 2 weeks while it took 12 weeks for archers to harvest only 5,418 antlerless?

BTBowhunter 08-11-2008 08:02 PM

RE: PA antler restriction
 
The USFS does not administer or enforce safety zones. Please show us where, as you claim,the USFS uses that in their criteria

livbucks 08-11-2008 08:02 PM

RE: PA antler restriction
 

Based on the USFS criteria forested land does not include residences that require a safety zone..
Can you provide a source for the USFS caring diddley about safety zones?

livbucks 08-11-2008 08:03 PM

RE: PA antler restriction
 
You owe me a Coke, Bob. :D

BTBowhunter 08-11-2008 08:06 PM

RE: PA antler restriction
 

ORIGINAL: bluebird2


I didn't challenge the percentage of 2B that has trees but you have no basis for inferring howmuch of that forested areamay or may not fall within the safety zone rules
Wrong again. I presented the data that showed only 20% of 2b was developed while 57% was forested. Based on the USFS criteria forested land does not include residences that require a safety zone..

Also, would you care to explain why if firearms hunters have less access than archers, why those hunters harvested 8,900 antlerless in 2 weeks while it took 12 weeks for archers to harvest only 5,418 antlerless?
Yet another post demonstrating your ignorance of area 2B. The firearms season totals 8 weeks+ in area 2B

BTBowhunter 08-11-2008 08:08 PM

RE: PA antler restriction
 

ORIGINAL: livbucks

You owe me a Coke, Bob. :D
I'll be happy to buy you a coke anytime but after these past few days, maybe it's time for a beer or three;)

bluebird2 08-12-2008 04:28 AM

RE: PA antler restriction
 

The USFS does not administer or enforce safety zones. Please show us where, as you claim, the USFS uses that in their criteria
I didn't claim that the USFS enforced safety zones or even cared about safety zones.But, they definitely determine if a section of woods is a developed subdivision or a contiguous stand of forest.

BTW,when did they reduce the safety zone reg. to 50 yds. for archery/

BTBowhunter 08-12-2008 06:04 AM

RE: PA antler restriction
 

ORIGINAL: bluebird2


The USFS does not administer or enforce safety zones. Please show us where, as you claim,the USFS uses that in their criteria
I didn't claim that the USFS enforced safety zones or even cared about safety zones.But, they definitely determine if a section of woods is a developed subdivision or a contiguous stand of forest.

BTW,when did they reduce the safety zone reg. to 50 yds. for archery/
What you did was quote a USFS stat to try and dipute Gregs accurate observation that much of 2B is safety zone and accessable to archers but not gun hunters

The safety zone for archery was changed several years ago. At least 5 or 6.

Oh and 2B currently has 8+ weeks of gun hunting for antlerless deer, 9+ if you count early muzzy season, not the two weeks as you stated in your last attempted distortion


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:40 AM.


Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.