Just an fyi... have not had a chance to watch the tape again. I'll reply when I do.

AJ,
Thanks for getting rid of the comment. Was totally uncalled for. I would hope everyone can agree on that.

Thanks AJ, sorry I was a nag but I thaught that was a bit over the top.

Hey big T, we found something we can agree on!

To all,

In regards to my deleted post:

I understand that the comments I made could have been taken out of context and assumed as racially motivated, but I assure they were not intended to be. I was speaking in all honesty that the mediator basically had no idea nor did she seem to care about what the guests were talking about. None of my comments on her physical description were relavent to the conversation and in my own mind thinking back I should have simply omitted the details. I have no problems with anyone of any race or religion and I appologize if I offended anyone.

Regards,

Jason

It just makes you wonder how hunters in PA can be so far apart on this issue.Some agree with the DCNR that DPSM need to be as low as 5 in big tracts of state forest.Then there's the other side that liked the idea of 30-50 dpsm.I'm in the middle.Try to maintain the herd at 15-20 which allows hard but decent hunting yet according to biologists in the beginning of this herd reduction it would allow for regen.15-20 was the original desired goal if I remember right.