Go Back  HuntingNet.com Forums > Regional Forums > Midwest
Ill license fee increased. >

Ill license fee increased.

Midwest OH, IN, IL, WI, MI, MN, IA, MO, KS, ND, SD, NE Remember the Regional Forums are for Hunting Topics only.

Ill license fee increased.

Old 03-15-2010, 02:38 PM
  #11  
Typical Buck
 
hunt12ga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 650
Default

Nonresident guests, sorry but here it goes! IMO we should leave the resident prices the same and kick up the nonresident tags, licenses, etc. It's getting harder and harder for residents to find a place to hunt due to out-of-state leases. Might as well let them help us afford our tags.

rw
hunt12ga is offline  
Old 03-16-2010, 10:22 PM
  #12  
Typical Buck
 
jrfrmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: N. Illinois
Posts: 527
Default Fee increase

Magic word here, IF? We live in the state of Chicago.



Originally Posted by fastetti View Post
As long as the money goes back into hunting activities I have no problem in the price increase. I honestly thought that the hunting licenses in Illinois were almost too cheap before. To ensure hunting in the future in Illinois, I am happy to pay the increase. A $5 increase isn't bad at all since it hasn't been raised in years.
jrfrmn is offline  
Old 03-17-2010, 10:21 AM
  #13  
Giant Nontypical
 
salukipv1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: IL
Posts: 6,575
Default

I could care less about reciprocal fees. I'd like to see a limit to what they charge residents vs. non-residents.

Prime examples, new mexico sheep, $163 resident, $3,187 non-resident.

MT elk res- $20, non-res $593
MT deer res- $16, non-res $343
salukipv1 is offline  
Old 05-06-2010, 06:12 PM
  #14  
Spike
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Genoa, IL
Posts: 23
Default

Originally Posted by salukipv1 View Post
Prime examples, new mexico sheep, $163 resident, $3,187 non-resident.
Holy Crap!!!! I thought IL deer tags were bad...
camber1981 is offline  
Old 05-14-2010, 07:16 AM
  #15  
Boone & Crockett
 
Lanse couche couche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Southwest Ohio
Posts: 10,277
Default

As someone who was once an official Illinois resident and now is a non-resident, i dont really have any problems with the regular resident and non-resident license and permit fees. However, the one thing that does drive me bananas is the fact that I own 29 acres of land in Illinois, but am expected to pay normal non-resident permit fees to deer and turkey hunt on it. You only get cut slack if you own 40 acres or more, which is pretty silly. People should get a cut rate as non-resident landowners whether they own five acres or 500, as long as they are hunting on it.
Lanse couche couche is offline  
Old 05-28-2010, 05:42 PM
  #16  
Spike
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 16
Default

Lanse I own 52 acres in Illinois I bought to hunt on & retire to and I may be paying the same for my out of state landowner permits that you are paying, I`m not sure. Its ture resident landowners who have 40 acres or more do get free landowner permits. Thats why I wanted 40 or more acres when I was looking to buy, boy was I supprised that first year when I found out I was not getting free permits. The price of them have increased also. The first couple of years it was $125 for a bow permit now its $210, which I think is still cheaper than a non resident / general permit(not a landowner). About the only positive is that non residents can now buy a doe permit over the counter if they want extra doe tags.

Last edited by apointex; 05-28-2010 at 05:50 PM.
apointex is offline  
Old 05-28-2010, 09:18 PM
  #17  
Zim
Nontypical Buck
 
Zim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: LaPorte, IN
Posts: 1,110
Default

When I got divorced 4 years ago first thing I did was move 100 yards over the IL state line, wait 30 days and file for a lifetime license. Best $210 I ever spent. Even beat the rule change so I can move back out of state and still qualify. So I don't have to buy a license any more, just $26 tags.

I apply out west every year and I am not in favor of any states huge discrepency in R/NR fees. We are all nonresidents in 49 states.
Zim is offline  
Old 05-29-2010, 04:13 AM
  #18  
Spike
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: gulf coast
Posts: 76
Default

i hunted illinois the last 2 years as a non-resident on public land.i wont be going back.too expensive and restrictive for me.im going to another state in the midwest and hunt for 1/2 price.when that gets too expensive,and one day it will,then i will just stay home.all the states that have budget problems will keep increasing fees to pay for entitlement programs.in the long run,they will wind up losing money.a non resident hunter spends a lot of money besides license and tags.food,lodging and fuel money is also spent in that state.
rab123 is offline  

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service - Do Not Sell My Personal Information -

Copyright © 2021 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.