Carp Barrier Still not working
#11
After a bit more rooting around, it looks like the 20 million is for the removal of fish barriers. (addition of fish ladders?)
I can't actually find the text tho'. I looked in the appropriations bill but that beast is over 700 pages long. I hurt my brain in about 3 minutes of reading. [:-]
I can't actually find the text tho'. I looked in the appropriations bill but that beast is over 700 pages long. I hurt my brain in about 3 minutes of reading. [:-]
#12
Fork Horn
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From:
Ah - that makes sense. I am vaguely aware of this effort, mostly the removal of dams that no one really wants anymore, and that are hindering the migration of anadromous fish like salmons, steelhead, and american and hickory shads.
#13
Where I used to live on the Fox River, there was some movement to removal some of the low dams.
Fish movement was the main push but it seems some of that idea died out with thenorthern advanceof the bigheads and silvers. Also, boaters were against it as the natural river wouldn't support much boat traffic.
Since I've moved away, I don't know how much of a push there still is up there. It's not like there are salmon in the river.
I still think I should get 5 million for my carp removal and utilization project.
Fish movement was the main push but it seems some of that idea died out with thenorthern advanceof the bigheads and silvers. Also, boaters were against it as the natural river wouldn't support much boat traffic.
Since I've moved away, I don't know how much of a push there still is up there. It's not like there are salmon in the river.

I still think I should get 5 million for my carp removal and utilization project.

#14
Fork Horn
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From:
ORIGINAL: HNI_Christine
Fish movement was the main push but it seems some of that idea died out with thenorthern advanceof the bigheads and silvers.
Fish movement was the main push but it seems some of that idea died out with thenorthern advanceof the bigheads and silvers.
]
Original: HNI_Christine
I still think I should get 5 million for my carp removal and utilization project.
I still think I should get 5 million for my carp removal and utilization project.
#15
Craptracker err I mean Duane
, while I have you on the phone, what do you think about low head dam removal in relation to Asian carp movements? The reason I ask is that here in my hometown, Danville, IL , we have an old low head damand because it has caused a few fatalities over the last few years and it is being looked at by the Universityof Illinois engineers for removal. Now the Asians have already made it this far north on the Wabash and upstream the Vermilion river but don't seem to have gotten above that dam just yet. A biologist from the U of I explained to me that the Asian carp would never be a problem further up stream as the water clarity is excellent and supposedly has a lower plankton filtration rate? Does this make sense? If removing that dam would enable the Asians to move further upstream and endanger my smallmouth bass fishing, well now they've crossed the line!
, while I have you on the phone, what do you think about low head dam removal in relation to Asian carp movements? The reason I ask is that here in my hometown, Danville, IL , we have an old low head damand because it has caused a few fatalities over the last few years and it is being looked at by the Universityof Illinois engineers for removal. Now the Asians have already made it this far north on the Wabash and upstream the Vermilion river but don't seem to have gotten above that dam just yet. A biologist from the U of I explained to me that the Asian carp would never be a problem further up stream as the water clarity is excellent and supposedly has a lower plankton filtration rate? Does this make sense? If removing that dam would enable the Asians to move further upstream and endanger my smallmouth bass fishing, well now they've crossed the line!
#16
Fork Horn
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 237
Likes: 0
From:
ORIGINAL: robow7
A biologist from the U of I explained to me that the Asian carp would never be a problem further up stream as the water clarity is excellent and supposedly has a lower plankton filtration rate? Does this make sense? If removing that dam would enable the Asians to move further upstream and endanger my smallmouth bass fishing, well now they've crossed the line!
A biologist from the U of I explained to me that the Asian carp would never be a problem further up stream as the water clarity is excellent and supposedly has a lower plankton filtration rate? Does this make sense? If removing that dam would enable the Asians to move further upstream and endanger my smallmouth bass fishing, well now they've crossed the line!
#17
Duane, thank you for the information, I will pass it on. Yes, the rivers get much smaller as you move upstream and the bottom is more sand/rock/gravel and there are not a lot of slow deep pools. Whew, I feel much better now.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Cougar Mag
Hunting Gear Discussion
3
12-10-2007 01:39 AM




